INTRODUCTION
As the reader may see from the
heading of the e-mail reproduced below, it was sent only to the Very Limited Circulation
List
of The M+G+R Foundation.
However, after reviewing a Mr. Ken Welch's
announcement dated March 25, 2006, claiming an impending nuclear attack
in Houston, (1)
we chose to release this e-mail on a
worldwide scale for the specific purpose of trying to prevent the
making of two new "Patsies" or "Fall Guys", President Bush and Dr.
Condoleeza Rice.
As our readers know, we are not fond
of the policies of the Bush Administration but, as the 9-11 events
showed and, most recently, the US Port Administration scandal involving
Dubai confirmed, Mr. Bush and Dr. Rice are mostly ignorant as to what
is really
happening in his Administration and her Department.(2)
Subject: Sharing a Response
Date: Fri,
06 Jan 2006 18:05:26 +0000
From: Webmaster -
The M+G+R Foundation
To: Very Limited
Circulation
Re: Allegation: Cuba paid
Oswald to kill Kennedy
XYZ wrote:
I don't know whether the story is true or false. But the
timing of its release is very interesting ... it is part of a
global pattern in which the two camps in the coming World War are being
brought to increasing hate for each other.
News
Article: AOL News - Cuba Paid Oswald to Kill Kennedy, New Film (3) Says
Quote from
News Article:
"BERLIN (Jan. 4) - Cuba lay behind the
1963
assassination of President John F. Kennedy by Lee Harvey Oswald and its
agents provided the gunman with money and support, an award-winning
German director says in a new documentary film. Wilfried Huismann spent
three years researching "Rendezvous with Death," based on interviews
with former Cuban secret agents, U.S.. officials and a Russian
intelligence source, and on research in Mexican security archives.
The film, shown to journalists in Berlin on Wednesday, says Oswald
traveled to Mexico City by bus in September 1963, seven weeks before
the Kennedy shooting, and met agents at the Cuban embassy there who
paid him $6,500.
Oscar Marino, a former Cuban agent and a key source for the
documentary, told Huismann that Oswald himself had volunteered for the
assassination mission and Havana had exploited him.
"Oswald was a dissident. He hated his country... Oswald offered to kill
Kennedy," Marino said in the film.
"He was so full of hate, he had the idea. We used him.... He was a
tool."
signed by: XYZ
The M+G+R
Foundation Comments:
Writing this is very difficult for us but will do it for the sake
of our "Guardian Angels" of the NSA since we want to keep reminding
them
that "all birds ARE NOT of the same feather" and some may carry a
"deadly flu"
which is not
the Avian Flu...
Point blank: Castro
did not
pay anyone to kill Kennedy
(4) and he knows it,
in there lies the problem we want to address
Once again, the "brilliant strategists outsmart themselves" just like
Maxwell Smart of "
Get Smart"
fame. This Huismann documentary film is
the equivalent of the movie "
Wag the
Dog" wherein a spin doctor,
working for the Presidential re-election
campaign, must create a situation that will distract the public from
the President's scandalous affairs.
(5)
The Huismann documentary is designed to fan the anti Castro flames in
the American's hearts so that the intervention of the Bush
Administration in Cuba - in the midst of the upcoming worldwide mayhem
- is accepted and rejoiced over. Without taking sides or judging
political systems or leaders' honesty we pass on to judge the action:
It is simply somewhere between inane, stupid and asinine - they have
just tipped Castro what they are up to! Allow us to elaborate.
If Mr. Huismann would be producing a serious work, the first thing he
would have done was to look into the finding of The Assassination
Records Review Board - established by Clinton in 1992 and concluded in
1998 to review never seen records - now declassified - about the
assassination of Kennedy.
That was another effort to decipher the "mystery" - Mystery? Please!
Review
this,
this,
this together
with
this
and wake up
to reality!
But we are getting ahead of ourselves....
Just lightly touching on some of the concrete findings of the the
Review Board we find (official documents/interviews/etc.)
confirmation that:
1.
Oswald had successfully worked for the CIA and FBI before on legitimate
espionage work.
2. In Oswald's "famed" trip to
Mexico to allegedly secure Visas to Cuba and the Soviet Union... there
is much footage from CIA hidden camera by the Soviet Embassy of a man
who visited the Soviet Union Embassy frequently during those days and
used Oswald's name every time.... Oops! The picture does not show Lee
Harvey Oswald.... it shows another CIA operative.
3. The first man to interrogate
Oswald was James Hosta, FBI agent in Dallas. Called by the Dallas
police because he was very familiar with Oswald. In the interview of
this man, which we saw on video, we learn that:
(a)
Oswald was defiant and cocky (Remember how easily "he was found" and
picked up. Only wearing a T-shirt saying "I did it" and parading
himself before the Book Depository would have been an easier to find
him.)
(b) Cockiness came to an abrupt
end when Hosta asked Oswald about the trip to Mexico. He just wanted to
know how Hosta knew about that. He just crashed. Considering all other
possible incriminating issues, knowing about the trip to Mexico
would not have been such an incriminating piece of evidence
unless.... Oswald just realized that he had been set up and was
going
to be used as the escape goat. Oh, yes, he may have been involved
in the assassination plot but as "an inside job" with the
assurance that he'd be taken off the hook.
(c) Said interview was stopped
by "superior" orders and Mr. Hosta was not allowed to talk to Oswald
again nor release the
results of the interview then.
(d) Of course - Oswald was
indeed taken off the hook.... by Ruby - but that is another
story.... [A creative group indeed: A "Patsy" taking out another
"Patsy" who was soon to die of "natural" causes...]
Of course, there is far more evidence that keeps
Castro out of this. After all, there is public record that he offered
Johnson assistance for his election by engaging in a "mock war of
words" with him to strengthen his position as an anti-Communist in the
US.
In any case, our point is not to solve a "Whodunit" - our point is to
highlight to our secret services that it would have been simpler and
cheaper to
send Mr. Castro a formal announcement of an impending attack/invasion
to
Cuba than to produce Huismann's documentary. We pray to God that once
they see how silly this whole Huismann
thing was, they change their plans and avoid yet another entrapment.
NOTE: Would someone please tell
Mr. Huismann that for next documentary he should check what the History
Channel has aired already.... The above information and live
interviews have been broadcast by the History Channel in English,
Spanish and Portuguese..... It did not even cost us a cent - we just
recorded it in an old cassette from the TV direct. So much for the
research we are credited of conducting so that we have the information
we do....
_________________
(1) Document
evaluating Mr.
Ken Welch's March 25, 2006, allegations
(2)
In
Defense of
George Bush
(3)
About
Huismann's documentary
(4) Discussion
about the Kennedy Assassination
(5) In the plot of
this movie, Conrad Bream, the spin doctor, with the help of movie
producer Stanley Motss (Dustin Hoffman), manages to convince the
public, using media manipulation techniques, that America is at war
with Albania. The headlines that result from this manipulation soon
take precedent over the President's alleged tryst with a young
girl. Of course, the movie was released on 1/9/1998 - just
in time to
manipulate the public further and pressure Clinton out of office.
Coincidence - of course not! Preplanning - of course! Even poor
Monica Lewinski was a "plant" without her knowing about it - just
another unsuspecting "Patsy"
©
Copyright 2006 - 2015 by The M+G+R Foundation. All rights reserved.
However, you may freely reproduce and distribute this document as long
as: (1) Appropriate credit is given as to its source; (2) No changes
are made in the text without prior written consent; and (3) No charge
is made for it.
The M+G+R Foundation
About Us and Frequently Asked
Questions
Our
Research Department
Please Note: If the above
dated image does not appear on this document,
it means that you are not viewing the original document from our
servers. Should you have reason to doubt the authenticity of the
document, we recommend that you access our server again and click on
the "Refresh" or "Reload" button of your Browser to view the original
document.
If you wish
to
contact The M+G+R
Foundation, please Click Here and
follow the instructions.