Trump
and the Invasion of the West (1)
A Guest Document by
Patrick J. Buchanan
June 20, 2018
INTRODUCTION by The
M+G+R Foundation
We are publishing this Guest Document in an effort to
give those who read our pages a better understanding of what is really
taking place, even though Mr. Buchanan has no idea what the ultimate
objective of these events really is.
We are in a position to objectively comment on this matter because of
the on-the-ground and lived-in experiences that we have had in both
continents,
experience which is minor in comparison with what God has
revealed miguel de Portugal
(2) about this
subject
matter over the last quarter of a century - all of
which we are seeing happening before our own eyes.
As you read the following article remember the key objective of the
World Masters - the one they think is their goal:
Globalization. What better way to reach their golden dream than to
promote mass exodus in the Americas and in the European an African
continents. It is hard to think of a better way to promote and achieve
the global instability that they need to establish a New
World Order (3).
What they do not know is that satan is using them to pave the way for
his grad entrance as the falsified savior of the world.
What a pathetic group. If they could see themselves with our vision
they would virtually die of embarrassment and shame. They are not even
good at being bad! That is the highest degree of failure.
We will add a few comments at the end of the Guest Document.
The
Full un Edited Article
“It is cruel. It is immoral. And it breaks my heart,” says former first
lady Laura Bush of the Trump administration policy of “zero tolerance,”
under which the children of illegal migrants are being detained apart
from their parents.
“Disgraceful,” adds Dr. Franklin Graham.
“We need to be ... a country that governs with a heart,” says first lady
Melania Trump. “No one likes this policy,” says White House aide
Kellyanne Conway, even “the president wants this to end.”
And so it shall - given the universal denunciations and photos of
sobbing children being pulled from parents. Yet striking down the
policy will leave America’s immigration crisis still unresolved.
Consider. Since 2016, some 110,000 children have entered the U.S.
illegally and been released, along with 200,000 Central American
families caught sneaking across the border.
Reflecting its frustration, the White House press office declared:
“We can’t deport them, we can’t
separate them, we can’t detain them, we can’t prosecute them. What (the
Democrats) want is a radical open-border policy that lets everyone out
into the interior of this country with virtually no documentation
whatsoever.”
Where many Americans see illegal intruders, Democrats see future voters.
And with 11,000 kids of illegal immigrants in custody and 250 more
arriving every day, we could have 30,000 in custody by summer’s end.
The existential question, however, thus remains: How does the West,
America included, stop the flood tide of migrants before it alters
forever the political and demographic character of our nations and our
civilization?
The U.S. Hispanic population, already estimated at nearly 60 million,
is predicted to exceed 100 million by 2050, just 32 years away.
And Europe’s southern border is more imperiled than ours.
A week ago, the new populist regime in Rome refused to allow a boat
full of migrants from Libya to land in Sicily. Malta also turned them
away. After a voyage of almost a week and 1,000 miles, 630 migrants
were landed in Valencia, Spain.
Why did Italy reject them? Under EU law, migrants apply for asylum in
the country where they first enter Europe. This burdens Italy and
Greece where the asylum-seekers have been arriving for years.
Of the landing in Spain, Italy’s interior minister Matteo Salvini, a
leader of the populist League party, chortled:
“I thank the Spanish government. I hope
they take in the other 66,629 refugees (inside Italy). We will not be
offended if the French follow the Spanish, the Portuguese and Maltese,
we will be the happiest people on earth.”
If the migrants boats of the Med are redirected to Spanish ports, one
suspects that the Spanish people will soon become as unwelcoming as
many other peoples in Europe.
And Trump is not backing down. Monday he tweeted:
“The people of Germany are turning
against their leadership as migration is rocking the already tenuous
Berlin coalition. Crime in Germany is way up. Big mistake made all over
Europe in allowing millions of people in who have so strongly and
violently changed their culture!”
Whatever European leaders may think of him, many Europeans are moving
in Trump’s direction, toward more restrictions on immigration.
In Germany, a political crisis is percolating. The Bavarian-based CSU,
longtime coalition partner of Chancellor Angela Merkel’s CDU, is now
talking divorce if Merkel does not toughen German policy.
Merkel has never fully recovered from the nationalist backlash against
the million migrants she allowed in from Syria’s civil war. A New
Year’s Eve rampage in Cologne, featuring wilding attacks on German
girls by Arabs and Muslims, cost her dearly.
Among the reasons Bavarians are pulling away from Berlin is that, being
in the south of Germany, Bavaria is a primary point of entry.
Virtually every one of the populist parties of Europe, especially of
the right, have arisen to contest or to seize power by riding the issue
of mass migration from Africa and the Middle East.
Yet the progressives adamantly refuse to act, apparently paralyzed by a
belief that restricting the free movement of peoples from foreign lands
violates one of the great commandments of liberal democracy.
We are truly dealing here with an ideology of Western suicide.
The population of Africa, right across the Med, is anticipated to climb
to 2.5 billion by midcentury. And by 2100, Africa will be home half of
all the people of the planet.
If but a tiny fraction of the African and Middle Eastern population
decides to cross the Mediterranean to occupy the emptying towns and
villages of an aging and dying continent, who and what will stop them?
Trump may be on the wrong side politically and emotionally of this
issue of separating migrant kids from their parents.
But on the mega-issue - the Third World invasion of the West - he is
riding the great wave of the future, if the West is to have a future.
CONCLUSION by The M+G+R Foundation
miguel de Portugal witnessed - first hand - the breaking down of all
internal borders in Europe as the European Union "wonderland" was
taking shape. He also witnessed the establishment of the one currency -
the Euro - and, since then, he has witnessed the collapse of Europe as
the result of such half baked European "wonderland". A collapse in all
fronts - from moral to standard of living to security.
He witnessed the implementation of many features of the U.S. system -
out of context, of course - in their "wonderland", while he has
also witnessed the implementation of many of the European Union failed
features in the U.S. - also out of context. The results of such out of
context alleged improvements is what we are witnessing at either side
of the Atlantic, which is in keeping with the Globalization efforts of
the intellectually and
spiritually challenged Masters of the World.
They are using the innocent people of the world - yes, those poor
children and their parents - to advance their agenda while those whom
they have planted in the media, the NGO's, and the alleged Christian
Groups yell "Foul!" to attain the desired result among the uninformed
and unsuspecting masses.
After the Castro regime took over Cuba and proceeded to reduce a first
world country into rubble, 10 % of the Cuban population emigrated to
the United States. At that time the Federal, State and Municipal
governments swung into action and the 600,000 plus wave of immigrants
became a positive and constructive force in the United States. Why?
Because the flow of immigrants was well organized and administered and
there were no hidden agendas or ulterior purposes. So, we have seen -
and lived !! - that first hand too and know that it can be done.
In closing... In an editorial in June 19th, 2018, (4) the National Review explained what must
happen next. "Most critics don't
grapple with the fact that the administration literally doesn't have
the option of holding parents and kids together for more than a few
weeks," the editors wrote. "Congress has it within its power to make it
possible to hold families together and - if they don't have legitimate
asylum claims - swiftly return them home together."
NOTES
(1)
Original
Source
(2) miguel de Portugal
(3) The New
World Order
(4)
Source
Published on June 20th, 2018
© Copyright 2018 - 2021 by The M+G+R Foundation.
All rights reserved. However, you may
freely reproduce and distribute this document as long as: (1)
Appropriate credit is given as to its source; (2) No changes are made
in the text without prior written consent; and (3) No charge is made
for it.
Disclaimer
The M+G+R Foundation
About
Us and Frequently
Asked Questions
PAGE of
INTRODUCTION to DOMAIN
HOME PAGE
HOME PAGE - Español
HOME PAGE - Portugues
Back
Up HOME
PAGE
Our Research Department
Please Note: If the above dated image does not appear
on this document, it means that you are not viewing the original
document from our servers. Should you have reason to doubt the
authenticity of the document, we recommend that you access our server
again and click on the "Refresh" or "Reload" button of your Browser to
view the original document.
If you wish to contact The M+G+R Foundation, please
access our Contact Page and follow the
instructions.