---

Reiner Fuellmich (1), an experienced trial lawyer licensed in Germany and California (USA) and co-founder of the Berlin Corona Investigative Committee (2), summarizes the Committee's findings to date and reviews the current status.

After consulting "about 150 distinguished scientists and experts from all around the world", "The Berlin Corona Committee already now has extremely incriminating evidence proving that this corona plandemic never had anything to do with health", also sentencing that "our governments ... are not acting in the best interest of their people".

You can listen his entire declaration in this video:



Or, you can read the full transcript of said video in the lines below.


Complete Transcript (3)


INTRODUCTION

PART 1 - GOVERNMENTS AND JUDICIARY

PART 2 - PANDEMIC RE-DEFINITION

PART 3 - THE PCR TEST AND THE VACCINES

PART 4 - WHAT PLANS MR. GLOBAL IS OPENLY PURSUING



Hello. I'm Reiner Fuellmich and I want to tell you about the results of the investigations of the Berlin Corona Committee to date. I've been working together with my colleagues in my firm as a trial lawyer for 27 years. I'm licensed to practise law in Germany and in California.

Until Covid emerged, we exclusively represented consumers and small and medium-sized businesses against global criminal corporations such as Deutsche Bank, VW [Volkswagen] and Kuehne-Nagel, the world's largest freight carrier.

That changed after a virus, previously labeled harmless, was suddenly declared the cause of a global pandemic in March of 2020, and the world was suppressed with lockdown, social distancing and mask mandates, as well as mass PCR testing and so-called vaccinations for perfectly healthy people.

No coherent explanation was ever given for this sudden change of opinion from "don't worry, this is a harmless virus" to "this is a very dangerous virus many people will die". Instead, the governments and the mainstream media deliberately spread panic. There are several leaked internal documents of the ministries of the interior and various countries that prove this targeted fear-mongering.

This was done by a worldwide lockstep approach of continuously blasting out the alleged danger of the alleged new virus via the mainstream media. In order to make this horror story credible, it was emphasised with horrific images from Bergamo, Italy, and New York, amongst other places. This was to suggest to everyone that there was every reason to panic - very strange, as one would expect a real government to try and keep the population calm if there really was an emergency.

In the meantime, we have come to understand that, at least until the beginning of the rollout of the so-called vaccines, there was no excess mortality anywhere. The horrific images were partly staged and partly based on gross medical malpractice.

In the face of this chaotic situation, which occurred literally overnight - as if on command - our colleague Viviane Fischer and I, together with two other lawyers, founded the Corona Investigative Committee in Berlin on July 10th, 2020.

We did this in order to get answers to the questions to which our Federal government - for reasons unknown to us at the time - was not prepared to provide answers.

Above all, we wanted to know:




Back to Index



The results of the Corona Committee's

Let me first summarize the outcome of the Corona Committee's work to date.

Since July 10th, 2020, we have consulted with about 150 distinguished scientists and experts from all around the world and from all areas of science, including health, law, economy, psychology, and psychiatry, on these questions: How dangerous is the virus? How reliable is the PCR test? And, How much harm is caused by the anti-corona measures?

Among these experts are Dr. Mike Yeadon, former vice president of Pfizer, Professor Luke Montagne, Nobel laureate from France, Catherine Austin Fits, investment banker and former deputy minister of the of the US, and, also, most recently, politicians such as Sue Frost, member of the Board of Supervisors of Sacramento County in California.

Now, if someone had told me a year and a half ago that the outcome of the Corona Committee's work to date would be this, I would have told them to take their pills and see their doctor. But our hearings prove the following results beyond a reasonable doubt:



Back to Index


The behaviour of the German judiciary in the Covid cases

How did we come to this conclusion?

Well, before Covid, each of us had had their own, sometimes strange, encounters which made us wonder if something isn't quite right, but we couldn’t really put our fingers on what it was exactly. Long before Covid came on the scene, my colleagues in my firm and I had a clear sense in our work time and again that something was wrong in the German courts of law.

Global corporations, such as Deutsche Bank, VW [Volkswagen] and Kuehne-Nagel, seem to be above the law in the German courts. Because, for example, Deutsche Bank, one of the most criminal organizations in the world, is regarded by politicians as "systemically important", and, thus, de facto, given special protection in the courts of law as well. VW [Volkswagen] gets special protection simply because they are the largest employer in the German state of Lower Saxony.

Our suspicion, that the German judiciary is so heavily influenced by politics, that it is no longer capable of applying the applicable law to such corporations and uncovering their fraudulent activities, turned out to have a real basis. The German phrase "they hang the small fry, but they let the big fish go because they’re supposedly too big to fail" is reality.

Based on the behaviour of the German judiciary in the Covid cases, it is now clear beyond any doubt to us that this is indeed the case. German judges who decide the cases before them, not in line with the Covid panic agenda of the government, but on the basis of the applicable law, are not only put under pressure behind the scenes. Rather, this is now done openly with the arbitrary brutal methods of an anti-democratic, even totalitarian regime.

This is obviously done to send a message to the judiciary as a whole so as to prevent them from applying the applicable law and, thus, questioning the government line.

Back to Index


The dramatic example of a judge in Weimar (Germany)

The dramatic example of a judge in Weimar and the experts he called upon for deciding a case proved this.

He had asked three experts to provide expert opinions in response to a complaint from a mother of two, that her children were suffering severe physical and psychological harm in school from being forced to wear masks, to comply with social distancing and constantly getting PCR tested. All three experts are respected professors at German universities. On April 8th, 2021, on the basis of this expert testimony, he ordered that the school and the school principal had to stop all such measures immediately.

Based on the testimony of the expert witnesses, he had determined that the measures were without any factual basis. Because the PCR test, invented (4) by the - now highly - controversial German professor Drosten, is not approved - [emphasis] is not approved - for diagnostic purposes, but only for scientific purposes. And, contrary to the claims of professor Drosten, it can in fact under no circumstances tell us anything about infections.

In addition, he had found that these Covid measures caused very serious damage to the health of the children, of which the long-term consequences are incalculable.

A few weeks after the decision, due to political pressure, his house, office, and car was searched and his computer and cell phone were seized because he was accused of a crime.

The accusation [was] of bending the laws in the air, which is a crime. But the specific accusation was not that his decision was wrong on its merits. No. In fact, it still stands unchallenged on its merits and for a very good reason: Both a court of appeal in Portugal and an administrative court in Austria had previously come to the same conclusion, that a PCR test cannot detect infections and, therefore, cannot be the basis for any anti-corona measures.

Instead, the accusation was that, as a family court judge, he did not have subject matter jurisdiction to decide the case. Rather, the criminal - obviously politically driven - case against him, states that an administrative court has subject a matter of jurisdiction over such cases. However, in the meantime, several appellate court decisions in Germany have confirmed that in such cases of endangerment of a child's welfare, of course, the family courts have jurisdiction and must intervene, not the administrative courts.

Parallel to this, such searches and seizures were also carried out at the homes of the three expert witnesses, the lawyer, who had supported the children, and a popular artist, who happens to be a friend of the judge.

Shortly thereafter, such searches and seizures were also conducted at the home of another respected professor. This professor is one of the world's best known experts on vaccinations and vaccines who have been critical of the safety and efficacy of these injections as they are not backed up by any scientific or medical studies.

Back to Index




Prologue to Parts 2, 3 and 4

How could it have come to this in a country that calls itself a democracy?

Specifically, how is it that politics in Germany and in other countries, in gross violation of the roman legal principle of "audiator at ultra pars" - which means "hear also the other side" -, with the help of mainstream media exclusively spreading government propaganda and denigrating any and all dissenting opinions as right-wing, right-wing, Nazi, Nazi, are now enforcing Covid measures ever more harshly without any factual bases.

Meanwhile, Mr. Global and his political puppets are calling for permanent lockdowns - first, Covid lockdowns, then, climate lockdowns - and the continued use of untested alleged vaccines, not just once, but regularly - regularly recurring every six months - shots every six months.

In some countries, this is already reality.

I will give you the answer below, based on the Corona Committee's expert hearings, by first reporting the facts about the actual dangerousness of the virus and the reliability of the PCR test and the health and economic damage caused by the measures.

Then I’ll explain what plans Mr. Global is openly - [emphasis] openly - pursuing, as evidenced by the written and oral statements of, for example, World Economic Forum founder Klaus Schwab and Microsoft founder Bill Gates, while distracting the population from these goals with the help of the of the Covid pandemic.

And, finally, I’ll explain how we, the people, can regain, not only our sovereignty, but also the assets that have been stolen from us by Mr. global for decades.

Back to Index


It doesn’t make a difference anymore if it was artificial or natural

First, let's take a look at the Covid measures and how they were never about health. This virus is no more dangerous than a common flu.

There are indications that the original virus, allegedly first detected in Wuhan, was artificially produced in the Wuhan Institute of Virology by means of so-called gain of function experiments. Such experiments intend to make a virus more dangerous - in particular, to cause it to jump from animals to humans.

These are, in fact, experiments for the production of bioweapons. Among others, the U.S. immunologist Dr. Fauci and the aforementioned German virologist professor Dr. Drosten, were significantly involved in such gain of functions experiments.

There are a lot of things that need to be clarified, but this much is certain: the original virus has long since ceased to exist. Rather, as with every flow virus, various variants - mutations - have been documented that may spread more quickly but are far less dangerous than the original virus - and it doesn’t make a difference if it was artificial or natural.

In addition, however, there are considerable doubts that the virus was ever isolated in a scientifically correct manner.

Many scientists assume now that the flu virus or influenza A or B was merely relabeled by Mr. Global into a corona virus pandemic.

Ultimately, however, none of this matters, for the question of the severity or dangerousness of the virus is easy to answer.

Back to Index


The question of the severity or dangerousness of the virus

In the meantime, even the highly controversial WHO - which is in fact controlled by its largest donors, including the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and its offshoot GAVI, which together have a stake in almost all vaccine manufacturers in the world - agrees with professor John Ioannidis of Stanford University, one of the most cited scientists in the world: the severity of the virus, with a so-called infection fatality rate of 0.14 to 0.5 percent, corresponds with that of the flu.

There was no excess mortality anywhere before the beginning of the so-called vaccinations.

As far as there were isolated increases or spikes in mortality - for example, in Bergamo (Italy) and in New York - these are explained with massive medical malpractice.

In Bergamo, predominantly very old people’s pre-existing conditions in nursing homes had died. Their immune systems had previously been weakened by vaccinations and, then, in order to keep the hospitals free for the panic stricken Covid patients - who never arrived - sick people, including influenza patients, were transferred to the elderly care homes. These, then, infected the weakened people there.

In addition, the WHO had installed Raineri Guerra into the Italian Ministry of Health, who falsified the data for the pandemic exercise plans. Their last pandemic exercise had not taken place in 2016, but in 2006, so that the medical professionals were unprepared. In the meantime, he is not working at the Ministry of Health anymore but the Italian public prosecutor's office is investigating him.

In New York, as every year during flu season, some, but by no means all hospitals, were overcrowded. On the Hospital Ship Comfort, with a thousand beds available, no more than 20 to 40 beds were ever occupied. In New York, it also affected predominantly older people, with pre-existing morbidities.

Without the panic messages in the media, many people who would have stayed at home and cured themselves under the correct assumption that they were ill with a flu or flu-like illness, stormed some of the hospitals and fell victim to, either hospital germs, or massive medical malpractice - by, for example, intubation instead of receiving oxygen, with oxygen masks, or far too high dosages of hydroxy-chloroquine, or being treated with dangerous medications such as Remdesivir.

Of course, respiratory illnesses, including this one, which is now called Covid-19, are, like the flu, dangerous diseases. And, of course, Covid-19, just like the seasonal flu, has individual severe courses of illness and, also, death.

Typically, however, the immune system intercepts the virus and, especially, the highly toxic spike protein in the mouth and nose. It only becomes dangerous when the immune system is bypassed and the - mind you - highly toxic spike protein, but also other ingredients such as mRNA and lipids and other nanoparticles, are injected directly into the body.

In any case, as post-mortem examinations carried out in Germany have shown in the meantime, the people who allegedly died with or from Covid before the start of vaccinations, with few exceptions, had all passed the average human life expectancy and/or suffered from other serious pre-existing diseases.

Virtually, none of the people who allegedly died of Covid had actually died from Covid. 96 percent of the people who allegedly died of Covid in New York and Bergamo, and 85 of those in Sweden, had died from completely different diseases.

Back to Index


How was the corona pandemic invented? What was behind this?

How was the corona pandemic invented? What was behind this?

Based, in part, on the testimony of two former WHO employees and advisors, but also on the testimony of historians and investigative journalists, as well as scientists, we can now trace the following chronology.


Concrete planning for the corona pandemic has been going on for at least 10 years, and this is verifiable. The corona pandemic has been a concretely planned pandemic by Mr. Global for at least 10 years.

Previously, in 2009, an attempt by Mr. Global to turn the Swine Flu into a pandemic failed, literally, at the very last second. In particular, because the German lung specialist Dr. Wolfgang Woldarg, who, at the time, had political power as a member of the German Bundestag and the European Council, had exposed that pandemic as a mild flu.


Back then, the WHO had, unexpectedly, changed the definition of a pandemic overnight, so that, today, any flu can be declared a pandemic. Until then, a pandemic was considered to be a worldwide disease with many severe illnesses and many deaths. And, suddenly, it was supposed to be, simply, a worldwide disease event, without the need for many severe illnesses and many deaths.

Due to this completely surprising and never explained change in definition, it was possible for the WHO - which is closely intertwined with a global pharmaceutical industry - to declare the Swine Flu a pandemic in 2009.


The consequence of this was that expensive vaccines were produced and sold worldwide on the basis of contracts that have been kept secret to this day.

These vaccines not only proved to be completely unnecessary - because, contrary to all the horrific announcements from the pharmaceutical industry and universities close to it (millions of deaths were allegedly going to happen worldwide if vaccination wasn’t carried out), the Swine Flu ultimately turned out to be a mild flu.


Furthermore, the vaccines led to serious health problems. Around 1300 children in Europe, especially in the Scandinavian countries, became incurably ill with narcolepsy and are now permanently disabled.


Long before the current corona pandemic, dozens of patents on the corona virus, including the spike protein, and also on the so-called vaccines, had already been registered.

Even before the outbreak of the alleged corona pandemic, American scientists were explicitly advertising investments in corona vaccines to potential investors.


In October of 2019, before the corona pandemic rolled out in March 2020, with lockdown, social distancing, mass mandates and, finally, the so-called vaccines, a final exercise took place in New York under the title "Event 201". The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the World Economic Forum and the Johns Hopkins Centre for Health Security were involved.


Shortly thereafter, an outbreak of what is now known as Covid-19 allegedly occurred, for the first time, in Wuhan China due to an, allegedly, novel corona virus. A short time later, however, the excitement died down in China, and the alleged novel disease had been brought under control. Mr. global, however, used the Wuhan incident as a springboard (so to speak) to set in motion his long-planned corona plandemic.

Back to Index




The staging of the pandemic with the help of the Drosten PCR test

The staging of the pandemic with the help of the Drosten PCR test. This is the centrepiece.

While all politicians and physicians worldwide (among them, also the virologists professor Drosten), as well as the mainstream media, were still reassuring the citizens and explaining that the virus from China would, just like a mild flu, not be noticed by the vast majority of the people, that no special measures needed to be taken (in particular, that masks were completely unnecessary and pointless), professor Dr. Drosten, whose academic background is now highly doubtful, invented (4) a PCR test with which Covid-19 infections could allegedly be detected.

This was at the beginning of January of 2020, while he was telling everyone that there was nothing to worry about.

In two papers, the contents of which were disseminated worldwide by the WHO, he made two false claims - deliberately false, as has since been established. Two false claims that were crucial to the pandemic.



Now, asymptomatic infections with respiratory viruses, such as influenza or corona, do not exist - as most recently proven by a study conducted with 10 million subjects in Wuhan in late 2020, and as Drosten also knew when he published this.

And the PCR test invented (4) by Nobel prize winner Kerry Mullis is neither approved nor suitable for diagnostic purposes. This is because it cannot distinguish between living and dead viral fragments and it also tests positive for fragments of a virus left over from the immune system's fight against the flu or cold that has long since passed. In particular, the test cannot determine whether a whole virus (fragments are not enough anyway) has entered cells and is replicating there.

Drosten knew all this and had explicitly stated, six years earlier, in a newspaper interview concerning the MERS virus, which is another coronavirus, that a positive test had no meaning, but that completely healthy people could also test positive.

Back to Index


New rules to declare a public health emergency of international concern

Virtually overnight, for reasons that have not yet been fully resolved, but that suggests an involuntary early start to this pandemic, Mr. Global, through the WHO politicians and mainstream media, suddenly, changed his mind. Mr. Global put pressure on the WHO to quickly declare a public health emergency of international concern - public health emergency of international concern.

According to the - freely invented - rules of the WHO, such an international health emergency is the only basis on which completely new untested drugs (in this case, so-called vaccines) can be used on humans. Usually, the development and approval of a new drug takes at least eight to ten years.

At the first emergency meeting in February of 2020, those present could not agree to declare this fake public health emergency of international concern - because there were no cases!

Nevertheless, because of the allegedly highly dangerous situation, the group agreed to meet again, two weeks later. At that second emergency meeting, the fake, the public health emergency of international concern, was actually declared. What had changed? Well, nothing.

Back to Index


The role of the PCR test in the declaration of a fake emergency

However, professor Drosten had made his PCR test available to the WHO. And, with the help of this test, the cases needed for the declaration of a fake, had been created.

Today, it must be assumed that the proclamation of the public health emergency of international concern and, subsequently, all Covid measures, were based solely upon completely meaningless false positive test results.

First of all, a PCR test per se cannot detect infections, contagious infections, under any circumstances, as I just explained.

Above all, however, Drosten had set up his test in such a way that it was guaranteed to generate false positives. This is because of the so-called cycles of amplification, which one needs to evaluate the results of the test. That is, the machine into which the swabs are placed enlarges the molecules that are, otherwise, invisible to the human eye in many cycles (so-called cycles of amplification, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, etc.)

There’s now a consensus that anything over 24 cycles is completely unscientific and, therefore, useless. Therefore, the Frankfurt Health Department doesn't take test results of more than 24 cycles into consideration at all. And Dr. Mike Yeadon, formerly of Pfizer, has stated (in agreement, by the way, with Dr. Fauci), that more than 35 cycles results in at least 97 percent false positives. And the Drosten test, which served as a blueprint for the vast majority of tests subsequently performed worldwide, in that test, 45 - [emphasis] 45 - cycles of amplification were used.

Back to Index


The so-called vaccines and the question of informed consent

This was followed, always accompanied by the panic orchestra of the mainstream media and the vast majority of politicians in quick succession, by the Covid measures such as a lockdown - which had been invented shortly before in China -, social distancing, mass mandates and, finally, the so-called vaccines.

These alleged vaccines are, in reality, gene therapeutic experiments on unsuspecting - [emphasis] unsuspecting - humans, because there was no valid informed consent.

To be emphasized at this point, that every invasive medical intervention is a bodily injury or battery unless the patient explicitly consents to it. And his consent is invalid if he is not informed correctly and completely, that is,



 This concept of informed consent is the most important result of the Nuremberg Trials of 1946.

However, it was precisely these injections, designated by way of deception as "vaccines", with substances that have not previously been tested in scientific studies for their safety and efficacy, that had been Mr. Global's goal from the very beginning,

The subsequent steps ordered after the proclamation of the fake - lock down, social distancing, compulsory masking - served only to make the population believe in a danger that didn’t exist to unsettle and disorient them and, thus, make them so compliant that they would finally consent to the so-called vaccines as the only means of obtaining protection or immunity against the disease.

Back to Index


The void reason and the dangers of these "vaccines"

There is no reason for the use of these vaccines. This is because, as stated above, there is no Covid pandemic at all. Only a PCR test pandemic.

Apart from that, there are highly effective and completely harmless alternative preventive and curative treatments, as outlined above.

Even worse, the vaccines are completely ineffective, as the example of Israel shows - particularly dramatically. There, 86 percent of the people treated in hospitals for Covid are double vaccinated.

And, the vaccines are highly dangerous.

Through a whistle-blower, it has become known that the numbers of deaths after vaccination in one of the U.S. registers have been falsified. Conservative estimates now arrive at, at least, 500,000 deaths after vaccination since the beginning of the vaccine rollouts.

In addition, there are other serious side effects, such as neurological disorders, thrombosis, myocarditis, and more.

For the fall, winter and coming spring, experts expect severe problems for those vaccinated when they encounter the so-called wild virus in the form of a cold or flu virus. Due to ADE [Antibody-dependent Enhancement], cytokine storm, autoimmune diseases and more severe cases of thrombosis, among others.

Since these "vaccines" damage the immune system, not only will each subsequent booster cause more damage, but precisely the contact with the so-called wild virus will as well.

All the massive side effects that have occurred in the meantime were known to the American CDC long before the vaccine rollout began. Worse yet, as evidenced by the now disclosed contents of both the manufacturers documents submitted to the EMA (the European Medical Agency) and the manufacturer’s secret contracts with nation states, the manufacturers do not know whether their so-called vaccine is effective - they do not know it.

Nor do they know if it is dangerous. But they demand immunity from nation states in the event that claims are made against them for vaccine injuries. And they also explicitly demand that, if there are alternative methods of treatment (which do, of course, make vaccines completely unnecessary) their experimental products must still be purchased.

Back to Index




A summary of the plans

Finally, let's take a look at the plans of Mr. Global and the control politicians and how these plans can be prevented.

Amazingly, anyone can read what Mr. Global and his puppets, such as Klaus Schwab (the founder of the World Economic Forum) or Bill Gates (the Microsoft founder and world's largest vaccine investor) are up to. It is all out in the open.

For many years, following in his father's footsteps, who was a convinced eugenicist, Bill Gates has been talking about the need to dramatically reduce the world population.

For years, he has been in the headlines, again and again, for using alleged vaccines in Africa and India, which, in reality, led to the sterilization of women and girls.

Klaus Schwab goes in the same direction and spells this out, for example, in his book, The Great Reset, and demands, beyond that (supported by the current pope, by the way), a World Government, under the UN, which has, in the meantime, been brought under control by the WEF [World Economic Forum].

This is to be achieved by creating as much worldwide chaos as possible in the form of pandemics, wars - including civil wars - and natural disasters, so that the world population becomes convinced that the national governments are overwhelmed and only a world government can help.

At the same time, Schwab calls for the shifting of all wealth to Mr. Global, so that in 2030 no one (except, of course, Mr. Global) will still own anything. But will, supposedly, be happy with that.

In addition - and this is a central building block in Mr. Global's strategy - cash is to be abolished and replaced by a digital currency.

This will be allocated to, or taken away, from every person in the world, who can then also be found anywhere at any time by various tracking systems. This is to be done by a single central world bank.

Quite obviously, therefore, (this is, in particular, the opinion of the psychologists and psychiatrists whom the Corona Committee has heard), when it comes to Mr. Global and his puppets, we're dealing with psychopaths and sociopaths.

And here's another important piece of information. Through the WEF [World Economic Forum], initiated by Klaus Schwab in 1971, Mr. Global has been training his own puppets, since 1992, through the Young Global Leaders program.

Angela Merkel and Bill Gates were among the first class to graduate the class of 1992.

Even a large number of current leaders - politicians, predominantly weak personalities with however mostly well-trained rhetorical skills - also come from this program, including Macron in France, Kurz in Austria, Justin Trudeau in Canada, Jacinda Ardern in new Zealand, but also the German health minister Jens Spahn and the EU Commission had Ursula von der Leyen.

Back to Index


Facing to accountability

Against this background, which increasingly more people are recognizing, very large legal disputes have been set in motion or are now being set in motion in India, in South Africa, in the US, in Canada and in France, among others.

Their goal is to hold those who are responsible for this pandemic accountable under both civil and criminal law. This also includes that the assets that have been taken away from the world's population by Mr. Global and the global corporations and NGOs - controlled by him, not only since Covid, but already for decades -, are returned.

In those cases where there are no clear criminal actions but where, instead, contracts are the basis for damages, these should all be void. In particular, Anglo-American law, with its powerful tools of class action, pre-trial discovery and, of course, punitive damages, in the event that willful intentional infliction of damage can be shown, provides the tools for very effective justice. In Portugal, Austria and Germany, excellently written court decisions have stated that the completely unsuitable drugs and PCR test cannot be a basis for any Covid measures.

The Berlin Corona Committee already now has extremely incriminating evidence proving that this corona plandemic never had anything to do with health. Rather, Mr. Global's actions are aimed solely at these goals:






We are dealing - this must be stressed once again - with megalomaniac psychopaths and sociopaths which must be stopped and, in fact, should have been stopped a very long time ago. But, now, the time has come.

More and more people worldwide are waking up and realizing who is pursuing which goals with this plandemic. Even if the mainstream media is hiding it, hundreds of thousands of people are taking to the streets all over the world, including in London (England), Berlin (Germany) but also in Australia, Brazil, etc. More and more politicians and lawyers, medical doctors as well as public service employees, even police officers, refuse to participate in these crimes against humanity.

Back to Index


An optimist epilogue by Mr. Fuellmich

But, in addition to our legal efforts, and in addition to our efforts to disclose the facts and bring everything out into the open, there is a third level - namely, the spiritual or religious or cosmic call,  what you will level. And this level, we deem, is crucial.

We can see this in a story a German doctor told us very recently at the Corona Committee. He wanted to draw money at an ATM and went into the lobby of a bank. There stood an elderly woman wearing a mask, who fearfully backed away from him because he was not wearing a mask. She said he had to wear a mask because, otherwise, she was afraid of infecting herself and then her husband. The doctor told her - no, she shouldn’t be afraid. And, then, he went up to her, took off her mask and hugged her. The woman began to cry and said that no one had held her for more than a year.

That's what this is all about. Humanity versus inhumanity. We are human. We can laugh, cry, sing, dance and hug. The other side, Mr. Global and his puppets, can't do that. They can only fake feelings and have no empathy at all. This is because the other side has no access to the spiritual side.

The US constitution starts with the words "we the people". And, when the wall came down, between East and West Berlin, 33 years ago, it was the east German people chanting "we are the people that brought it down". Mr. Global's house of cards will come crashing down the very same way.

Without any doubt in my mind, Mr. Global and his puppets will lose this war of good against evil. They will lose their insane war against life and creation itself. There is no other way.

Back to Index



NOTES by The M+G+R Foundation

(1) The proper title for Mr. Fuellmich is Doctor (Dr.), but not Doctor of Medicine. To avoid confusion, we have omitted the treatment in the title of this document.

(2) Corona Investigative Committee - Home Page | About

(3) Index, titles, formatting, highlighting and notes in brackets by The M+G+R Foundation. Notes in parenthesis are transcription from Dr. Fuellmich' speech. An unedited, automated transcript from YouTube is available here.

(4) To better qualify the words by Mr. Fuellmich, that Dr. Drosten or Dr. Mullis invented the (Covid-19) PCR Test:




En Español:  Conclusiones de Comité de Berlín de Investigación del Coronavirus - Un informe de Reiner Füllmich

Date of the video in BitChute: September 15th, 2021
This transcript: Published in this site (The M+G+R Foundation) on October 4th, 2021



Related Documents




DISCLAIMER - The M+G+R Foundation is not associated in any way with Dr. Fuellmich, YouTube nor BitChute.