COVID-19 a Bioweapon?
Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola
September 12, 2021 (1)
* In his book, “Is COVID-19 a
Bioweapon? A Scientific and Forensic Investigation,” Dr. Richard
Fleming documents evidence showing SARS-CoV-2 is a bioweapon created
over the past two decades
* Once you conclude that SARS-CoV-2 is a bioweapon, you must also
recognize that the COVID shots are nothing more than the genetic
reproduction of that bioweapon. In other words, they are bioweapons too
* The same people involved in the funding of this bioweapon are the
same people who have interfered with doctors providing treatment to
patients, and the same people who have been involved in the development
of these COVID shots
* Health care workers are injecting people with something they cannot
possibly give informed consent for, which means health care workers are
violating their Hippocratic Oath
* Health care workers who give these COVID shots are also violating the
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights Treaty, the
Nuremberg Code, the Declaration of Helsinki and other legal statutes
Helping you take control of your health in these crazy times is Dr.
Richard Fleming, a prolific author in addition to being a physicist, a
nuclear cardiologist, researcher and attorney.
Here, we discuss his latest book “Is
COVID-19 a Bioweapon? A Scientific and Forensic Investigation”,
slated for release September 7, 2021. It’s currently available for
preorder on Amazon. It’s an incredibly well-documented book and
contains history that many of us aren't aware of. As it turns out, the
creation of this virus goes back not a year or two but two decades.
area of aptitude [is] physics and calculus, the mathematic language for
that. Physics, and particularly high energy particle physics, is
something that I find very fascinating.
I eventually wound up doing some of
that later on in life as a nuclear cardiologist. So, [I’ve done] 53
years of research in physics, and in medicine, I actually developed the
inflammation in heart disease theory and presented it to American Heart
I joined American Heart in 1976 as
the youngest faculty member at that time, and I got put in several
standing committees as a result — basic and advanced cardiac life
support as well as the physician cholesterol education faculty.
I did a lot of research on dietary
influences and factors that are critical, not only for in the end —
heart disease — but other chronic inflammatory diseases, be that
cerebrovascular diseases, strokes, diabetes or cancer,” Fleming
Back to Contents
Standing on Principles of Ethics
Fleming is also a scientific reviewer for more than 16 different
journals. He was on the external clinical review board for The Lancet,
but quit in protest of the fake hydroxychloroquine article they
published — an act I believe demonstrates his dedication to scientific
integrity. He also resigned from the British Medical Journal Open
Quality due to similar concerns.
either stand behind principles or we acquiesce and become nothing more
than the German doctors of Nazi Germany during World War II,” he says.
“And as history showed us, they eventually paid a price at the
Nuremberg Trials …
There are people — powers that be — that think that they have things
going their direction, but it's very clear to me that they're not
confident that they've got everybody under control. The way in which
this is all being handled demonstrates that they're more worried about
the truth coming out than not. And I think they're worried about the
consequences, as they should be.”
Back to Contents
Digging Up the Truth
Early on in 2020, Fleming started researching treatment options for
SARS-CoV-2 using the Fleming Method, which you can learn more about on flemingmethod.com. Using
this method, you can measure how a given intervention works on the
tissue level, and how infection or inflammation is responding to the
He ended up developing 52 treatment combinations, and over the course
of that study, the length of hospitalization stays went from five to
six weeks down to one to two weeks. But he also learned something else.
the process of doing that research, I dug more and more and
investigated what was going on, and that led me into the background of
the research that many of these people had been doing,” Fleming
“Tens of millions of dollars have
been funneled out of the U.S., and Anthony Fauci has helped with that.
He's been on those committees. You can see the grant numbers in the
Back to Contents
Is COVID-19 a Bioweapon?
While gain-of-function can be used for benevolent purposes, it can just
as easily be used for nefarious ones, “and that's kind of what you see
happening,” Fleming says.
see real efforts to produce viruses, coronaviruses, in particular.
Spike proteins of coronaviruses to be even more specific, as I show in
the book, paid for by the federal government by people who say they
were not involved in gain-of-function research.
Well, their fingerprints are on the
documents, or on the published papers or on the grants or on the
patents. You can't say that you're not involved in things when the
documents show differently. They show the work and the money that came
out of the federal government that went to Peter Daszak at EcoHealth,
that went to Ralph Baric at the University of North Carolina, Shi
Zhengli at the Wuhan Institute of Virology and other places.
For me, as a researcher, obviously,
once I start to investigate something, the only way you can stop me
from doing that is to put a bullet in my head. Otherwise, I'm going to
stay after it. There are things that are not in the book that are going
to come out in international criminal court, things I'm saving for
that, because this virus is, by definition, a biological weapon.
It violates the biological weapons
convention treaty. You just have to look at the definitions. It
provides nothing useful to humanity. It's dangerous. When Fort Detrick
is involved and the Department of Defense is involved … and you see
these monies and you see the people that are involved, you realize that
… the United States was playing China, China was playing the United
States, and you saw who got caught in between. And they're still
playing the game.
For lack of a better term, this book
is an indictment. That's now my attorney hat going on saying that I
have provided in this book evidence that I would take to a grand jury …
I'm not somebody who is going to give up on having these people dealt
with, because all the freedoms that we have lost, and the rights that
we have lost as individuals, not to mention just the numbers of people
who have died.
My argument is … the reason why they
died is because they didn't get treatment for the inflammation and the
blood clotting that I and other doctors have shown works. The ultimate
argument is that you can't kill somebody more than dead … they can't do
worse than kill the patient. And we've already seen what doing nothing
does. It kills the patient.
At no other time in American history
have doctors looked at patients and said, ‘We can't do anything for
you. Go home and come back when you get sicker.’ We have always treated
people with breathing problems with medications for breathing problems.
We've always treated people with clotting problems with medicines to
stop the clotting.
And so, the reason why this is so
critical to understand is because the same people who were involved in
the funding of this bioweapon are the same people who have interfered
with doctors providing treatment to patients, and the same people who
have been involved in the development of these vaccines.”
While Fleming carefully lays out the evidence in his book, he leaves it
up to you, the reader, to decide whether SARS-CoV-2 is a bioweapon or
not. However, he says, if you do come to that conclusion (and he
believes you will once you’ve seen the evidence), “then you have to
recognize that the vaccines are nothing more than the genetic
reproduction of that bioweapon.” Hence, the COVID shots are bioweapons
Back to Contents
Warning to Medical Professionals
If you are a doctor, nurse, pharmacist or other health professional
administering these COVID shots, you may be wise to reconsider your
participation in this scheme. A significant problem is there’s no way
to provide or obtain informed consent. As noted by Fleming:
you're injecting someone with these drug vaccine biologics, you are
injecting them with something that you cannot possibly give them
informed consent for, which means you're violating your Hippocratic
Oath, you're violating the International Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights Treaty, you're violating the Nuremberg Code, you're
violating the Declaration of Helsinki.
It's right across the board. It's not
even something that you can pretend doesn't happen anymore. It's just
in everybody's faces. And you can see that the powers that be are so
stressed out right now that they are cajoling and coercing and
manipulating and attacking. My friends in Italy tell me that vaccinated
people are behaving in the same way that they did during World War II
towards the Jews and the intellectuals.
And let's remember, the first people
Hitler put in concentration camps weren't the Jews. The first people
were the intellectuals, because if you take the intellectuals and the
doctors off the street, if you stop people from talking, you can
control the people.
So, the pressure being put on the
medical community in this country and in countries around the world to
simply go along is nothing more than the equivalent of what Adolf
Hitler and the SS did during World War II when they rounded up the
intellectuals. One [thing] will lead to the next and there's nothing
about this that has been a successful campaign to control an infectious
All you have to do is read the
emergency use authorization documents. I'm just stunned at how many
people have not read these. I'm stunned at physicians not having read
On flemingmethod.com, you can find several video presentations
and PDFs where Fleming goes through the emergency use authorization
documents. With that data in hand, Fleming suggests asking yourself
some fundamental scientific questions, such as: “Is there any
statistical difference in the number of people who developed COVID-19
or died among the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated?”
The answer provided in the documents is no. There is no statistical
difference between the two groups. The vaccines do not statistically
reduce COVID-19 infection or death thereof. There are fewer cases in
absolute numbers, but statistically there’s no difference. Add to that
the risk of side effects. If you take the shot, you risk developing
inflammation and blood clotting.
The same people that were involved in the funding of this bioweapon are
the same people that have interfered with doctors providing treatment
to patients, and the same people that have been involved in the
development of these vaccines. ~ Dr. Richard Fleming
As noted above, coerced administration of these shots violate any
number of laws. Fleming also cites supreme court rulings in which the
court ruled people have the right to choose their own health care.
versus California had to do with an individual who was forced to
undergo emetic medications to force him to vomit, to bring up things in
his stomach. The Supreme Court said, ‘You do not have a right to force
this medication on people.’
Griswold versus Connecticut showed
that the U.S. government cannot take away the personal rights of health
care in individuals unless there's some type of compelling and
substantial reason, and then it has to be put into law. It can't come
out of the executive branch.
Cruzan versus Director of Missouri
Department of Health in 1990, specifically stated that patients have a
right to refuse any treatment. You cannot force treatment on people.
Well, this is forced treatment. This is coerced treatment.
And Doe v. Rumsfeld proved in 2004
that investigational drugs could not be forced upon people unless there
is a presidential waiver or informed consent. Well, here's the kicker
on presidential waiver, which is what they're going to go to.
Anybody who takes an oath of office —
the president of the United States, senators, representatives to
Congress, governors, police officers, judges, lawyers, administrative
officials — cannot violate the U.S. Constitution. If they do, they've
committed treason, by definition.
In the U.S. Constitution, it states
that Treaty Law and the Constitution and statutes are the supreme law
of the land. The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
specifically states that you cannot force people to take a drug; that
they have to have informed consent, and that animal research has to
have been done beforehand to prove it's safe.
So, if a president, including this
one, issues an order that this is a mandate and is required, then he is
violating the U.S. Constitution by violating Treaty and therefore has
It's not only an impeachable offense,
it is punishable by death because that's [the punishment for] treason.
You can't force U.S. citizens to undergo forced experimentation.
And you can't get around that by
doing something cute like having the FDA say, ‘Whoa, well, we've now
approved it, OK?’ Because the Supreme Court has already ruled that you
cannot force people to take a treatment and the only party that can
change that is the Supreme Court.”
Back to Contents
Moderna Has Been Aware of Risks
You’ve probably heard that the mRNA in the COVID shots are designed to
stay right around the injection site. However, Fleming points out that
Moderna knew this wasn’t the case, as they published research in 2017
showing a lipid nanoparticle vaccine for influenza ended up in the
brain, bone marrow, liver, spleen and just about everywhere else in the
bodies of the test animals.
for people to come up now and say, ‘Gosh, golly gee whiz, we just
didn't expect that’ is a little disingenuous,” Fleming says. “And I
think you have to ask yourself, why does the cardiologist know about
the 2017 paper but the people responsible for the technology claim they
And so, what you see are normal
healthy people responding to a massive production of spike proteins and
healthy people should make a massive immune response. What does that
immune response do? It produces inflammation and blood clotting, and
then the spike proteins go across the blood-brain barrier and cause
prion diseases just like what's been shown in humanized mice and rhesus
I'm willing to bet that the people
who made this gain-of-function virus already knew that, because one of
the things that had the government and Big Pharma coming after me in
the 1990s [and] early 2000s was the fact that the research I was doing
in dietary and inflammatory disease had the same Neu-5-Ac raft receptor
that the glycoprotein 120 of HIV — which Shi Zhengli put [into the
virus] in 2004 — attaches to.
So, the people that were doing this
were paralleling my research … It turns out that that information is
critical for getting this virus to be able to attach and to infect
people like it's doing. So, it's interesting how you can be minding
your own business and doing really good research, trying to answer some
questions, and it might just expose the people that are doing nefarious
Back to Contents
What You Can Do if Your Job
Mandates the Jab
Flemingmethod.com is a real treasure trove of information that you can
surf through. There, you’ll also find sample documents for medical, religious,
legal and Constitutional exemptions to vaccination that you can
present to your employer, educational institution or anyone else trying
to bully you into taking an experimental COVID shot.
He also has fliers you
can print out and distribute that lay out your U.S. Constitutional
and statutory rights as a citizen, as well as petitions for the
President of the United States, Senate, House of Representatives and
state governors, calling on them to investigate those responsible for
this gain-of-function bioweapon. You can find all of those petitions
under the “Actions” tab at the top right corner. Fleming also
encourages people to take legal action.
working with a number of attorneys to file suits in [the U.S.], [and
I’m] one of the experts in the International Court and Italian courts
for suits being filed for crimes against humanity. So, the bottom line
answer to this is going to be everybody deciding that they need to take
action and [hold those responsible] accountable. And yes, this may mean
you lose your job …
You have to look at this, at this
point in time, and ask yourself what type of world are you leaving your
children and your grandchildren? This is never about you. This is never
about me. This is about the children and the grandchildren.
Whatever we leave them, they're going
to essentially be stuck with it. If we abandon them — and the founding
fathers did not abandon us — then we are responsible for allowing this
to happen. It's on us, so there's no easy way … If you ever wondered
what you would have done in 1930s Germany, today, you know.”
Back to Contents
Cases Filed With International
According to Fleming, Italian lawyers have already filed a case in
Italian Federal Courts and plan to file with the International Criminal
Court (ICC) in The Hague. Attorneys from six different countries are
also putting together a joint case. While the U.S. did not ratify the
ICC, American citizens can still be held accountable in the ICC.
Laws and statutes being relied upon include the Biological Weapons
Convention treaty, the Nuremberg Code, the Declaration of Helsinki and
the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. It’s now up
to the ICC to decide what it wants to do, and when.
“It doesn't really matter how long this
takes or to whom this has to go. I'm a firm believer that there are
enough good, honest people on this planet that if the people
communicate and work together, the tide on this can and will be
turned,” Fleming says.
“It’s the same story all over the world. All the people that I’ve
talked to in the different countries that I've been working with have
the same feeling. They're coerced. Their citizens are being bribed,
which, as a side note, anytime the government has to bribe the people
to do it, you have to say, ‘If it was really a good idea, why would you
have to bribe me? I would be lining up for it.’
I'm the ultimate, I think, research scientist. After 53 years, I really
feel very strongly about being a scientist physician. And I am
incredibly offended when Anthony Fauci says he is science, because he's
If these ‘vaccines’ actually worked and there was scientific evidence,
I'd be on here telling you to take it. What you're hearing me tell you
is, ‘Don't take it.’ These things are biological weapons. They're
nothing more than a genetic code of a biological weapon that was made,
that was paid for, and put together by nefarious people … I'm not
anti-vaccine. I'm anti-stupid.”
Back to Contents
We’re Battling the Biggest
Propaganda Campaign in History
In closing, Fleming says:
of the things I do want to make a comment on now is for the people who
have not been vaccinated. When you're looking at people who have been
vaccinated, step back for just a moment and recognize that many of
those people got vaccinated because they were told that this was the
only way to protect the people that they loved.
What we need to do is have the
intelligence and the compassion necessary to look at those individuals
and say, ‘I get it. No judgment.’ If there's a shedding problem or
something like that that you're dealing with, there are treatments
available that you can look at. I put those on the website, too.
But come together and support those
people, because they were just doing what they thought was right. Many
of them are scared, and they have been made so scared. By the way, what
type of country, what type of world, spends so much effort frightening
the blazes out of its citizens? That says something.”
Indeed, this is undoubtedly the most effective propaganda campaign in
the history of humanity, and it’s hard to blame someone for cracking
under that type of a coordinated assault. The good news is that common
sense has not entirely died yet. Fleming says:
think there's a lot of people that are very concerned that things have
gone south, so to speak. I'm actually encouraged. One of the things
that I've noticed about being here in Texas is that common sense has
not died … [and] what I've repeatedly gotten from people is ‘Don't dumb
It's not a matter of turning people
into Ph.D., M.D.’s or whatever, it's a matter of just being truthful
and honest with them. People have a really good capacity, when they get
away from all the nonsense happening, to look at the truth and realize
it's the truth and to listen to nonsense being thrown at them and
realize that it's just garbage and manipulation. So, common sense is a
really useful tool for everybody to have. That and compassion …
We used to frequently sit down and
have conversations with families and friends where you'd argue back and
forth and you discuss things, and I can't be the only person that would
walk away from a conversation and go, ‘Well, I hadn't really thought
about that. Let me think about that’ because that's kind of a different
point of view.
That exchange stopped when they
quarantined people, when they isolated us, put us in our homes and
controlled what you could see on the Internet and on television. Well,
we've come far enough back out of it that that exchange has started
People have had to fight to get that
information out, but it's that sharing of information and knowledge
that is so critical to turning this around, and actually bringing all
of this nonsense under control. Not just the virus, but the
manipulation of people that has been going on and the lies and the
deceit and the abuse of power. They used our money to do it. They used
our lives to do it. They used our livelihoods to do it.”
Back to Contents
To learn more, be sure to pick up a copy
COVID-19 a Bioweapon? A Scientific and Forensic Investigation.” You
can also find a lot of information on flemingmethod.com, including
suggestions for COVID-19 and side effects from either the COVID
shot or spike protein transmission from a person who got the shot.
Back to Contents
by Dr. Mercola 12-Sep-2021 (only available in the original site for
hours after publication date)
© Copyright by Dr. Joseph Mercola.
However, since August 2021 he declared: "Again
I will still be writing my daily articles that I started 25 years ago
BUT they will only be available for 48 hours before they are removed.
In this way I hope to continue my mission to help you take control of
your health – but it's up to you to download, share and repost this
content. I will not be enforcing my
copyright on this information so that you may freely share it."