PURPOSE
The purpose of this brief announcement is to draw to our
readers' attention a parallel situation so that there will not be any
surprises
for those who
have eyes to see and ears to hear.
BACKGROUND
In our document Preventing
Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) (1) we show that the efforts
associated with the Summit on
Nuclear Security would now be like closing the barn door after
the horse was stolen... actually it is more like trying to find the
door of an already stolen barn - never mind the horse!
Then, the question that should be asked is: Why
waste the time and resources
associated with the gathering
of world leaders only comparable to when the UN was organized after
World War II?
Granted - most
heads of state are only good at
getting elected since
they have shown repeatedly that, even with detailed
instructions, they could not punch their way out of a paper bag;
however, they just could not be so stupid as to "try to close the
door of an already non existing barn". Or we so hope...
DETAILS
The summit, as far as its stated purpose is
concerned, was a failure
as it may be clearly discerned through two different points of view -
US (2) and
French (3), both
of which try to paint a picture as positive as it could possibly
be without being able to mask the failure.
Regarding its more obscure purpose - it was a
success. There is now a
group of heads of state who, together, have agreed that a terrorist
nuclear threat is a reality and who have publicly agreed to "do
something about
it" sometime in the future. What else was agreed behind the closed
doors is another story.
The
Result: We have now a world population who has been
apprised - brainwashed
is a much better word - of the danger posed by nuclear material falling
in the hands of terrorists groups, a danger which, as we have pointed
out elsewhere (1),
has existed at least since the collapse of the Soviet
Union and the borders between European Union nations disappeared.
Now, let us rewind.....
A document prepared, in advance, for
the Bush Administration during
the Clinton
Administration - but not by it - was called Road Map For National Security: Imperative
For Change (4).
The document was embargoed until eleven days after President Bush was
sworn President of The US on January 20, 2001. The document was
essentially the outline for the Patriot Act which was "railroaded"
through the
US Congress right after the September 11, 2001 alleged surprise
terrorist attacks on New York and Washington, D.C.
Thereafter, the world - with the US at its head
- started to be
transformed into a Police State World.
Since
the September 11-type events have been
thoroughly proven as an ideal catalyst to quickly implement draconian
measures to "protect" the citizens of a nation - the US in this case
- the Masters of the World are ready to "go global".
CONCLUSION
Now, let us fast
forward....
Since the method has been successfully proven
and the world
population has been
brainwashed about the threat of nuclear terrorism - that could
conceivably
affect all, not only
the US - and the initial "bonding of world leaders" has been achieved
using the virtual adhesive of the Summit on Nuclear Security, it
logically follows that a staged - yes, we have said "staged" - nuclear
terrorist attack is fundamentally imminent so that the Police State (5) can
be quickly transformed into a Police World.
Of course, if the Masters of the World can
combine the staged nuclear
terrorist attack with an Iranian connection - Presto!.... The whole
world will be clamoring for the US-Israeli axis to swing into action
converting Iran into the third Middle East theme park - "The
Apocalypse";
Afghanistan and Iraq being the first two.
EPILOGUE
An open letter to the Masters of the World
Dear
Masters of the World,
We will now enjoy
watching what you will do next.
If you proceed as
described above, you will give us unmeasurable credibility before the
eyes of the ertswhile blind.
If you do not, you
will not be able to achieve what you have set to do within the
timetable
desired. Remember, according to M. Gorbachev (6) the Clinton
Administration delayed the establishment of the New World Order by ten
years and you are simply out of time.
Of course, there is always a "Plan B". Skip the "nickel-dime" nuclear
terrorist attack and go for the "big time" - Step No. 1 of the Sequence
of Events (7). A bit messier, we
admit, but you will be able to achieve the results much faster and make
up for the Gorbachev claimed lost time.
In this case also you will give us
an ever greater level of credibility. Thank you!
What
and how it
will come about is for God to decide for nothing occurs in this
Universe unless God allows it - not necessarily "cause" but "allow".
Regardless of your
choice, you
will remain in our prayers, after all, that is exactly what the Real
Master - Jesus Christ - taught us to do - Love your enemies:
do good to them that hate you: and pray for them that persecute and
calumniate you. [Matthew
5:44]
In His Name,
m de P
NOTES_______________________________
(1) Preventing
Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction
(2)
News Report
(3)
News
Report
(4) Road Map For National
Security:
Imperative
For Change
(5) The Emerging
Police State
(6) Delaying
the Establishment of the New World Order
(7) Sequence
of
Events leading the the End of These Times
Published on April 15, 2010 - European Union
Copyright 2010
by The M+G+R Foundation. All
rights
reserved.
The
M+G+R Foundation
About
Us
HOME
PAGE -
English
HOME
PAGE -
Español
HOME
PAGE -
Portugues
Back Up HOME
PAGE

Please Note:
If the above dated image does not appear on this
document,
it means that you are not viewing the original document from our
servers.
Should you have reason to doubt the authenticity of the document, we
recommend
that you access our server again and click on the "Refresh" or "Reload"
button of your Browser to view the original document.
If you wish to contact The M+G+R Foundation, please Click
Here and follow the instructions.
You may freely reproduce and distribute this document as
long as:
(1) Appropriate credit is given as to its source; (2) No changes are
made
in the text without prior written consent; and (3) No charge is made
for
it.