The
M+G+R Foundation
For Your Information and Reference
March 2022
Previous Month | Next Month | Current Posts | Disclaimer
For Your Information and Reference
March 2022
Previous Month | Next Month | Current Posts | Disclaimer
CONTENTS
March 29
March 26
March 23
March 12
March 9
The Pfizer pseudo-Vaccine has 1,291 Side Effects
A judge forced the FDA to release Pfizer's clinical data and it's worse than you can possibly imagine: (1)
The FDA was forced by a judge to release clinical data on the
COVID vaccines back in January and so 55,000 pages of documents were just released.
The FDA had originally wanted to hide the data for 75
years and release it in 2096 because, of course, the FDA is basically engaged in a criminal
conspiracy.
Hiding out in one appendix is the clinical data for Pfizer’s vaccine (2) – which lists 1,291 adverse side effects in alphabetical order.
You already know that children, especially young boys, can get myocarditis from the vaccines but you should add to that list the serious possibility of them getting: a brain stem embolism, acute kidney injury, cardiac failure, frontal lobe epilepsy, Hashimoto's encephalopathy, herpes, interstitial lung disease, or Type 1 diabetes mellitus – just to pick a few very serious side effects from a very sobering list.
The U.S. government’s own database, the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), has over 1 million reports of “adverse events” to the new vaccines – with 24,000 events listed as “death.” Pfizer was aware of more than 158,000 “adverse events” when they asked for approval from the FDA. People had serious issues after taking the Pfizer vaccine and Pfizer knew it before it sought approval for its vaccine.
Hiding out in one appendix is the clinical data for Pfizer’s vaccine (2) – which lists 1,291 adverse side effects in alphabetical order.
You already know that children, especially young boys, can get myocarditis from the vaccines but you should add to that list the serious possibility of them getting: a brain stem embolism, acute kidney injury, cardiac failure, frontal lobe epilepsy, Hashimoto's encephalopathy, herpes, interstitial lung disease, or Type 1 diabetes mellitus – just to pick a few very serious side effects from a very sobering list.
The U.S. government’s own database, the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), has over 1 million reports of “adverse events” to the new vaccines – with 24,000 events listed as “death.” Pfizer was aware of more than 158,000 “adverse events” when they asked for approval from the FDA. People had serious issues after taking the Pfizer vaccine and Pfizer knew it before it sought approval for its vaccine.
Our comment:
In part, this is good news: that still in the United States the legal-judicial system is capable
of achieving some transparency
(3). But, at the same time, it is an
ominous sign of the state of the world. We have not heard of another nation in the world where a
judicial/legal challenge at this level demanding transparency has been allowed to prosper
(4).
It is now even more evident the absolute lack of interest of governments around the world to objectively audit the results and methods of those companies that are being paid billions of dollars and entrusted with the public health of millions of citizens. If any government in the world took seriously the news that Pfizer concealed 1291 side effects, they would be shocked, but no one seems to have been surprised or re-examined their relationship with Pfizer or other pseudovaccine (5) manufacturers.
Pfizer withheld information that totally alters the perception of the risk/benefit of their pseudovaccines. The FDA actively participated in concealing that information. Is not that the definition of "fraud" and "institutional fraud"? But no criminal liability has resulted from this. Meanwhile, in the rest of the world, governments choose to ignore this and continue to grant pseudovaccine manufacturers a proverbial golden rail. They act as if the manufacturers' clinical studies can only be flawless and need not to be examined "in so much detail". Is this not the definition of a "conspiracy" (6) – a coordinated effort to conceal the truth?
If anyone, at this point, cannot see it (7), it is probably because they are not destined to see it (8), but the Mercy of God demands that we continue to warn while it is still possible.
It is now even more evident the absolute lack of interest of governments around the world to objectively audit the results and methods of those companies that are being paid billions of dollars and entrusted with the public health of millions of citizens. If any government in the world took seriously the news that Pfizer concealed 1291 side effects, they would be shocked, but no one seems to have been surprised or re-examined their relationship with Pfizer or other pseudovaccine (5) manufacturers.
Pfizer withheld information that totally alters the perception of the risk/benefit of their pseudovaccines. The FDA actively participated in concealing that information. Is not that the definition of "fraud" and "institutional fraud"? But no criminal liability has resulted from this. Meanwhile, in the rest of the world, governments choose to ignore this and continue to grant pseudovaccine manufacturers a proverbial golden rail. They act as if the manufacturers' clinical studies can only be flawless and need not to be examined "in so much detail". Is this not the definition of a "conspiracy" (6) – a coordinated effort to conceal the truth?
If anyone, at this point, cannot see it (7), it is probably because they are not destined to see it (8), but the Mercy of God demands that we continue to warn while it is still possible.
(1) Source (Article by Emerald Robinson; dated 4-Mar-2022) (Our underscoring)
(2) Pfizer - "Cumulative Analysis of Post-authorization Adverse Event Reports" (Note that, although this report is labeled as "Confidential", a judge has forced the FDA to release it)
(3) As we have amply explained elsewhere (an example), the United States of America is the last stumbling block for the plans of those who still think that they will be able to establish a New World Order.
(4) Is democracy not working as it should? - Another trap from satan
(5) Why do we insist on calling them "pseudovaccines" (apparent/fake vaccines)? Because, as they themselves have acknowledged, those biological devices do not provide sustained immunity (See The Failure of Covid "vaccines")
(6) Proven Conspiracies
(7) What we are seeing before our very eyes can be described as the establishment of totalitarianism
(8) Eyes to See and Ears to Hear. Who are those who possess them?
The entire New Testament summarized in two sentences
FROM OUR FILES: August 29th, 2009
From miguel de Portugal
Today we wish to present to you the entire New Testament in two sentences. It will show you, without a doubt, how simple all is and how complicated it has been made by man to glorify himself.
Jesus said:
Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the
Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. [Matthew 5:17]
...and He was speaking about the Law given to Moses as He confirmed through...
This is what I told you while I was still with you: Everything
must be fulfilled that is written about me in the Law of Moses, the Prophets and the
Psalms. [Luke 24:44]
Condensed Message of New Testament:
You are to:
Therefore, if you believe that I am the one and only announced Messiah, thus strive to act according to what I have just said, you will have Eternal Life.
Live in accordance to the Law given by God to Moses;
Recognize in Me the Prophetic announcements of the coming Messiah; and
Be aware that not living in accordance to the Law, the calamities announced by the Prophets will come upon you as natural consequences.
Recognize in Me the Prophetic announcements of the coming Messiah; and
Be aware that not living in accordance to the Law, the calamities announced by the Prophets will come upon you as natural consequences.
Therefore, if you believe that I am the one and only announced Messiah, thus strive to act according to what I have just said, you will have Eternal Life.
And that is it!
Related document: A Condensed Bible - Introduction and Conclusion
Back to Top
On the Act of Consecration to Mary staged by Francis in March 25th
Given its relevance, we have converted into a document of its own the information which was here. You can reach it through the following ink:
Back to Top
Why the news about Russian nuclear missiles in Cuba since 2012 are still being ignored?
FROM OUR FILES: August 4th, 2012
Russia has set their latest mobile strategic nuclear missiles "Oak" in Cuba.
After the meeting with U.S. President Barack Obama, Putin made a sudden harsh statement to the press. (1)
“In 2001 I, as the President of the Russian Federation and the
supreme commander, deemed it advantageous to withdraw the radio-electronic center Lourdes from
Cuba. In exchange for this, George Bush, the then U.S. president, has assured me that this
decision would become the final confirmation that the Cold War was over and both of our states,
getting rid of the relics of the Cold War, will start building a new relationship based on
cooperation and transparency. In particular, Bush has convinced me that the U.S. missile defense
system will never be deployed in Eastern Europe.
The Russian Federation has fulfilled all terms of the agreement. And even more. I shut down not only the Cuban Lourdes but also Kamran in Vietnam. I shut them down because I gave my word of honor. I, like a man, has kept my word. What have the Americans done? The Americans are not responsible for their own words. It is no secret that in recent years, the U.S. created a buffer zone around Russia, involving in this process not only the countries of Central Europe, but also the Baltic states, Ukraine and the Caucasus. The only response to this could be an asymmetric expansion of the Russian military presence abroad, particularly in Cuba. In Cuba, there are convenient bays for our reconnaissance and warships, a network of the so-called "jump airfields". With the full consent of the Cuban leadership, on May 11 of this year [2012], our country has not only resumed work in the electronic center of Lourdes, but also placed the latest mobile strategic nuclear missiles "Oak" on the island. They did not want to do it the amicable way, now let them deal with this”, Putin said.
The Russian Federation has fulfilled all terms of the agreement. And even more. I shut down not only the Cuban Lourdes but also Kamran in Vietnam. I shut them down because I gave my word of honor. I, like a man, has kept my word. What have the Americans done? The Americans are not responsible for their own words. It is no secret that in recent years, the U.S. created a buffer zone around Russia, involving in this process not only the countries of Central Europe, but also the Baltic states, Ukraine and the Caucasus. The only response to this could be an asymmetric expansion of the Russian military presence abroad, particularly in Cuba. In Cuba, there are convenient bays for our reconnaissance and warships, a network of the so-called "jump airfields". With the full consent of the Cuban leadership, on May 11 of this year [2012], our country has not only resumed work in the electronic center of Lourdes, but also placed the latest mobile strategic nuclear missiles "Oak" on the island. They did not want to do it the amicable way, now let them deal with this”, Putin said.
FROM OUR FILES: March 13th, 2014
From miguel de Portugal
As you may recall, on March 8th [2014] we sent the following communication to major media outlets in the US and Europe, as well as to the White House:
As you may recall, on March 8th [2014] we sent the following communication to major media outlets in the US and Europe, as well as to the White House:
Greetings!
Ladies/Gentlemen considering the US/Russia stand off over Ukraine (2), shouldn't you alert your readership ("citizens" for the White House copy) that Russia has had their latest mobile strategic nuclear missiles "Oak" in Cuba since early 2012?
Read on and act upon it for the benefit of your readers. (1)
The M+G+R Foundation
Ladies/Gentlemen considering the US/Russia stand off over Ukraine (2), shouldn't you alert your readership ("citizens" for the White House copy) that Russia has had their latest mobile strategic nuclear missiles "Oak" in Cuba since early 2012?
Read on and act upon it for the benefit of your readers. (1)
The M+G+R Foundation
Considering that this is not a rumor and is backed by the Russian press - which still has the article on line - the fact that, as of today, no one in the mainstream media has even mentioned it, it speaks the proverbial volumes.
May this serve to further confirm to you the level at which the media is manipulated on a worldwide scale by one single hand. Want to guess whose hand?
FROM OUR FILES: July 21st, 2018
Isn't it amazing.... with the flames of Russophobia (3) being fanned and sprinkled with high octane gas 24/7 by the Globalists, the one real acusation that could be used against Russia is not even acknowledged?
Allow us to help those who are on denial regarding this matter wake up and smell the proverbial coffee.
Russia has tactical nuclear missiles in Cuba since May 2012 and Cuba is only 90 miles away from US shores. No, it was not reported by a recent publication of the latest deceiver - QAnon (4). Mr. Putin said it, we have echoed it repeatedly and it still (5) is on line on the Kremlin favored Pravda. (1)
But there is more to it. We have communicated that information - with link included - to key Media outlets including the Washington Post, the New York Times, etc., etc. Yet, not a whisper about it throughout this seemingly out-of-control Russophobia.
THINK about it! Snap out of denial! Grab your Rosaries and start praying incessantly instead filling your heads with false news before it is too late.
TODAY: March 23rd, 2022
In conclusion
Why the news about Russian nuclear missiles in Cuba since 2012 are still being ignored?
The answer to that question was already unveiled years ago through our pages (6). Given that the news about those missiles in Cuba have not been used to charge Russia through the media, precisely now more than ever, when the Russian invasion of Ukraine is taking place, there is no doubt that the Globalists' plan to use Cuba – with the necessary minor adjustments – is still on their road map.
(1) Pravda - August 1st, 2012 - "Russia to revive army bases in three oceans"
(2) For our readers in 2022: It was in February and March 2014 when Russia invaded and subsequently annexed the Crimean Peninsula from Ukraine.
(3) The anti-Russia hysteria in 2016-2018 to denigrate and defeat Donald Trump
(4) QAnon - another face of the deceiver
(5) In 2018, when this commentary was originally published, and still in 2022 as we are re-publishing this
(6) The Real Purpose of the Castro Regime - Why the Castro Regime has lasted for so long
Back to Top
Legal Immunity: Do manufacturers of Covid "vaccines" trust in the safety their own "vaccines"?
See by yourself... (1)
Reuters News Agency released a report warning that
167 million refugees around the world are
at risk of not being vaccinated against Covid-19 because
pharmaceutical companies would not be covered by legal immunity in post-vaccination
injuries. Those companies could be forced to pay compensation for such injuries if those were to
happen to refugees
(2).
In contrast to refugees, native citizens in the US and the EU have no real way to be compensated
by pharmaceutical companies for post-vaccination injuries
(3)(4).
Draw your own conclusion.
If the risk of harmful side effects were small, it would be diluted in the benefit of tens of millions of inoculations, but they have calculated this and it does not pay off. Nobody can be more savvy than them on this, since they have all the data. And then, their conclusion is clear: every inoculation is a risk according to their yardstick - money.
We know this is not news to many but, still, it is a reminder that the simplest arguments to dismantle the official propaganda are in plain sight for everyone to see without the need to read endless studies or promises on the safety of Covid "vaccines".
What the risk/benefit analyses performed by others show is the severity of the risk, since the risk, as shown by the manufacturers' behavior, exists and is undeniable.
(1) Stephanie Snefff: Drug regulators and goverments must demostrate there is no illegal human experiment underway (11-Feb-2022)
(2) Reuters: Refugees lack COVID shots because drugmakers fear lawsuits (16-Dec-2021)
(3) CNBC: You can’t sue Pfizer or Moderna if you have severe Covid vaccine side effects (16-Dec-2020)
(4) France 24: Covid vaccine-makers largely protected on side effects (20-Apr-2021)
Back to Top
The Russia-Ukraine war is making many people think about...
Since February 24, the day Russia's military attack on Ukraine began, the document "The Closest Natural Nuclear Bunker to Your Home" has become the most visited daily document on our domain, at least for the 10 days following that date.
Comparing the visits since February 24 with the equivalent period of the previous month, we observe that the visits to this document have increased 20-fold. Since many come to our domain through search engines, this reflects that a large number of people have started to search the Internet for such information because they are really relating the Russia-Ukraine military conflict with the options of a nuclear war.
Study: People under 60 are more likely to die from the inoculation than from Covid
If one still tries to rationalize current events under the assumption that Covid pseudo-vaccinations are for health...
A cost-benefit analysis by Stephanie Seneff, Ph.D. and researcher Kathy Dopp concludes, among other things, that: (1)
(a) "Those under 18 are 51 times more likely to die from the inoculation than to die from COVID if not vaccinated."
(b) "Young adults age 18 to 29 have an 8 times higher risk of fatality from the inoculation than from COVID if not inoculated."
(c) The protection from COVID-19 death falls far short of the risk of dying from the vaccine, for anyone below 50 years old."
(d) "The COVID inoculations cause a net increase, rather than decrease, in the likelihood of death for all persons under 60 years old."
(e) "For those over 60 years old, the benefit of COVID inoculations is negligible, ranging from 0.0016% to 0.125%"
Their bottom line: "Mandates of COVID inoculations are ill-advised because the alleged vaccines result in higher death rates than COVID itself."
And their rationale on this outcome:
With Omicron now the dominant strain, the vaccinated population
are still catching the disease in large numbers and spreading it. The mRNA vaccines were designed
to target the original SARS-CoV-2 strain, and the arrival of variants like Delta and Omicron have
changed the risk/benefit ratio. With such a large
percentage of the population catching omicron and recovering, we now have a much larger base of a
naturally resistant population, whose immunity is much longer lasting and robust than that
achieved with the vaccine. With Omicron being both less deadly and more resistant to
vaccine antibodies, the benefits of vaccination are further weakened, while the risks of dying
from the vaccine remain unaltered. Even if we roll out new versions of the vaccines, the virus
will continue to mutate in a futile cat-and-mouse game.
This is just one study, do you want more?
42 Studies on Vaccine
Efficacy that Raise Doubts on Vaccine Mandates
150 Research Studies Affirm Naturally Acquired Immunity to Covid-19
150 Research Studies Affirm Naturally Acquired Immunity to Covid-19
(1) COVID-19 and All-Cause Mortality Data Analysis by Kathy Dopp and Stephanie Seneff (PDF) (dated 13-Feb-2022)
Back to Top
For Your Information and
Reference
Previous Month - February 2022
Next Month - April 2022
Year 2022 Index || General Archive || Current issue
Previous Month - February 2022
Next Month - April 2022
Year 2022 Index || General Archive || Current issue
En Español: Para vuestra Información y Referencia - Marzo 2022
© Copyright 2022 - 2023 by The M+G+R Foundation. All rights reserved. However, you
may freely reproduce and distribute this document as long as: (1) Appropriate credit is given as
to its source; (2) No changes are made in the text without prior written consent; and (3) No
charge is made for it.
Home Page |
English |
Español |
Portugues
Introduction for First Visit | Frequently Asked Questions
Search Page | Index of Documents
Disclaimer | About Us | Contact
Back Up Home Page (Mirror Site)
Introduction for First Visit | Frequently Asked Questions
Search Page | Index of Documents
Disclaimer | About Us | Contact
Back Up Home Page (Mirror Site)