The M+G+R Foundation
Guilty of 'Double
Standards' on Iraq" - Richard Butler
A Guest Document by
Originally Published by Reuters on January 28, 2003
Contents Even More Appropriate in Mid 2019
translate this text into any major language Click Here
purpose of this
guest document is to illustrate how, many times, the legitimate U.S.
government acts illogically when
it is to the best interests of the
Deep State/U.S. Shadow Government
which, in turn, is manipulated by the
World Masters. The illustration is more clear now than when Mr. Butler
made the statements quoted in this 2003 news report by Reuters.
Take careful note that since the Iraqi events took place in 2003 the
Middle East has become a most, if not the
most, unstable key part of the world. To that most dangerous scenario
we must add that the terrorism
that we allegedly went into Iraq to bring to an end has spiraled,
literally, out of control with
no end in sight.
For those who are not familiar with our writings:
(a) The financial and
military power of the United
States and of
its people is the last stumbling block for the fulfillment of the plans
of the World
Masters for their Globalist agenda (1).
Therefore, the function of the the U.S.
Shadow Government is
precisely to bring down the U.S. and get it out of the way of
plans for complete globalization.
(b) Whether the reader believes what we publish or not is of no concern
to us. Our objective is to shine a light, as best as we can, on the
dark corners of history in the making so that those who have Eyes to
See will see, and Ears to Hear will hear. The rest are destined to
remain in the dark with its associated consequences, thus, of no
Quoting Mr. Butler
(Reuters) - Former U.N. arms inspector Richard Butler said Tuesday that
Washington was promoting "shocking double standards" in considering
taking unilateral military action to rid Iraq of its weapons of mass
[underscoring by The
Butler, who led U.N. inspection
teams in Iraq until Baghdad kicked them out in 1998, said Iraqi
President Saddam Hussein undoubtedly possessed weapons of mass
destruction, and was trying to "cheat" his way again out of the latest
U.N. demand to disarm.
But a U.S. attack, without United
Nations backing, and without any effort to curb the possession of
weapons of mass destruction globally, would be a contravention of
international law and sharpen the divide between Arabs and the West.
"The spectacle of the United States,
armed with its weapons of mass destruction, acting without Security
Council authority to invade a country in the heartland of Arabia and,
if necessary, use its weapons of mass destruction to win that battle,
is something that will so deeply violate any notion of fairness in this
world that I strongly
suspect it could set loose forces that we would
deeply live to regret," Butler said.
Butler's successor as the chief U.N.
weapons inspector in Iraq, Hans Blix, reported Monday to the 15-member
Security Council that Baghdad had only reluctantly complied with its
latest demand to disarm.
Washington is pressing the United
Nations to take firm action but says it is prepared to go it alone and
has amassed a considerable military force in the region.
Butler, addressing a conservative
Australian think-tank, The Sydney Institute, said the stated U.S.
motive -- to rid Iraq of weapons of mass destruction -- lacked
credibility because of Washington's failure to deal with others on the
Countries such as Syria are suspected of possessing chemical or
biological warfare capabilities, he said.
U.S. allies Israel, Pakistan and
India have nuclear arsenals but have not signed the nuclear
The United States and other
permanent Security Council members were themselves the possessors of
the world's largest quantities of nuclear weapons, he said.
"Why are they permitting the
persistence of such shocking double standards?" Butler said.
He said that, instead of beating the
drums of war, the United States should propose an international
mechanism -- similar to the Security Council -- to enforce the
application of the three main conventions controlling the proliferation
of nuclear, chemical and biological weaponry.
It should also take the lead by
reducing its own stockpiles.
"I hope we don't have to await the
train wreck before we decide to change history," Butler said.
© Purpose/Introduction Copyright 2019 by The M+G+R
Foundation. All rights reserved. However, you may freely reproduce and
distribute this document as long as: (1) Appropriate credit is given as
to its source; (2) No changes are made in the text without prior
written consent; and (3) No charge is made for it.
Note: If the above dated image
does not appear on this document, it means that you are not viewing the
original document from our servers. Should you have reason to doubt the
authenticity of the document, we recommend that you access our server
again and click on the "Refresh" or "Reload" button of your Browser to
view the original document.
you wish to contact The M+G+R Foundation, please
access our Contact Page
and follow the