The M+G+R Foundation
The Book of Enoch
Divinely Inspired or Heresy?
We May Now Be Able to Answer That
The purpose of this document is to shed some light on the
controversy which continues to swirl around the Book of Enoch (1a) and the possible
relation between it and the great civilizations of antiquity which
the Egyptian, the Maya, the Inca and other legendary civilizations.
The purpose of this document is
not to convince anyone. We only strive to assist
humanity in its spiritual development. This is to be achieved not by
as the "Evangelizers" have done for nearly 1,600 years, but by
encouraging humanity to utilize the intellect granted it by God in conjunction with, and assisted by, the
Illumination of the Holy Spirit of God.
Who is Enoch?
Why may he be so important?
Although there is more than one
individual named Enoch (3),
the one we will focus on is the
father of Methuselah. [Genesis 4: 17-18 and 5:18-24]
After the birth of
Methuselah, Enoch walked with God for 300 years; and he begot sons and
daughters..... then he was no more, for God took him. [Genesis 5:22-24]
Here "God took him"
is not an euphemism for "dying". The writer of this part of Genesis was
very careful in stating "then he died" when writing about Enoch's
relatives ending their lives on Earth, but, when he wrote about Enoch
was different. "Good took him" as it later
happened with Elijah. Even when we read that Noah also "walked with
God" just as Enoch did, at the end of Noah's journey we read "then he
died" and not
that "God took him"
It is obvious then that Enoch
of similar spiritual status as Elijah.
Did Enoch leave a
Obviously he did if we are to
accept the Letter of Jude as a canonical book of the New Testament. On
verses 14-15 we read:
And to these also Enoch, the seventh from Adam,
prophesied, saying, Behold, the Lord came with ten thousands of his
holy ones, to execute judgment upon all, and to convict all the
ungodly of all their works of ungodliness which they have ungodly
wrought, and of all the hard things which ungodly sinners have spoken
Augustine (354-430), who is very revered by the Roman
Catholic Church establishment, confirmed that Enoch did write about
Also, Tertullian (160-230), Clement of Alexandria
(150-220), St. Atanasius, St. Jerome and others speak of Enoch's Book
as preserved in Noah's Ark in the time of the deluge", that is, they
considered it written by the Patriarch Enoch himself. (4)
Furthermore, what St. Jude cites in his
above quoted Letter is almost verbatim from the Ethiopic version of
the Book of Enoch [Enoch 1:9].
The words "the seventh from Adam" may be also found in the same book [Enoch 60:8] as spoken by
Noah, who refers to his grandfather in such manner. Enoch also referred
himself in such manner. [Enoch
Why is all of that
That question brings us to
the purpose of this document. The following
communication was received by The
M+G+R Foundation. This writer's logic is fueling much discussion
at all levels on a global scale. Therefore, God Willed that we address
it here for all to benefit from it :
In Christ to you all:
Beginning with the premise that knowledge is the key to understanding
and underpinning my Faith as a Catholic I began many years ago to
consider a number of books and subject material that many would call
I considered information on
subjects from authors such as Zecharia Sitchin to Discourses By St
Germain to "A Course In Miracles" to "Pole Shift".
The more I read the more I
found that ancient civilizations had common histories and legends even
though separated by thousands of miles and continents...
Many of these
histories support the conclusions that a race of beings from outside
the planet came to Earth and imparted knowledge to the cultures who
were here at the time...
church fathers disputed
Enoch's descriptions of two falls from Heaven-Lucifer and his followers
as we all know fell through Pride but a second fall of a group of
angels who were called Watchers and who saw and lusted after the
daughters of men on planet Earth. These Watchers came to earth, became
dense matter and essentially Incorporated as Mankind.
I believe that if one accepts
that possibility and further considers that these Watchers are working
today to undermine the faith of the believers in Christ through endless
channels and opportunities: spreading pornography, advocating and
advancing the agendas of abortion, homosexuality, the World View of
Religions ad infinitum then a clear intention may be formed from these
actions and understood for "those who have eyes to see and ears to
I ask that The M+G+R
Foundations examine the writings in the Book Of Enoch, consider
my remarks, and, by the Grace Of God, comment on the merit of my
May The Peace Of Our Lord Be
We will now strive to
bring forth information that should be considered
in conjunction with the writer's line of thinking.
As we have already pointed out in other documents (5), Biblical literalism can be
dangerous and lead to errors and/or fanaticism. For example: If God
only Created Adam and Eve, who did Cain marry? Or who did Seth marry to
become the ancestor - four generations removed - of Enoch? (3)
If the problem that
Catholic theologians have with the Book of Enoch was because his
account was almost unbelievable, why was
Chapter 6 of Genesis not also banned?
And it came to pass, when men began to
multiply on the face of the ground, and daughters were born unto
them, that the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they
were fair; and they took them wives of all that they chose. And Jehovah
said, My spirit shall not strive with man for ever, for that he also is
flesh: yet shall his days be a hundred and twenty years. The Nephilim
were in the earth in those days, and also after that, when the sons of
God came unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them: the
same were the mighty men that were of old, the men of renown. [Genesis 6:1-4]
According to Straubinger (4) some claim that the "sons
of God" were the descendants of Seth, while the "daughters of men" were
the daughters of Cain. Others claim that the "sons of God" were angels
who materialized and interacted physically with women.
hopes of settling this issue, let us take a look at the Book of Daniel.
furnace of torment we see Sidrach, Misach and
Abdenago prancing around the fire with someone described by
Nabuchodonosor as a "son of God" [Daniel 3:91-92]. Whereas
in the New Testament we read about Our Lord Jesus Christ
frequently describing Himself as the "son of man" yet His
Father is God.
It would then be safe to assume that the term
"son of man" refers to a spirit/soul that was born into the world (in
human flesh) - even though that spirit may be the Spirit of God;
whereas, "son of God" refers to a creature that was created to
exclusively be a spirit although
it may take the appearance
of a human: i.e. Raphael [Tobias 12:15-21].
unclean spirit takes
possession of a human body, i.e. the possessed of Gerasens [Mark 5:1-12],
then we are not dealing with an "appearance of" but with a
Now, going back to the Book of Genesis, Chapter
because the result of that interaction between the
sons of God with the daughters of men that God brought upon mankind the
great deluge. God wished to save only Noah and his wife, their three
sons and their wives plus a pair of each animals species of the world .
6:1-22] Therefore, if indeed those (fallen) angels, sons of
God - or Watchers as Enoch called them - had taken human form,
married and impregnated the daughters of men and contaminated human
creation - after the deluge, they
should not have existed any more. End of the problem! Or was it?
look at the world today. By all standards, most of humanity
into practicing everything that has been shown as evil in the Holy
Scriptures - from
Genesis on to the Book of Revelations. It seems that behavior of the
sons of men
has become a textbook case of all encompassing moral degradation.
Therefore, the explanation regarding the reproductive interaction among
the sons of God and the daughters of men is inadequate to justify the
level of depravity attained by mankind at the
start of the 21st Century. (6)
theory can explain the tremendous advance of ancient cultures nor their
mythical heroes [Genesis 6:4].
However, as the saying goes "where there is smoke, there is
fire!" Therefore, let us follow the "smoke"....
what if those (fallen) sons of God spoken about in the Books of Genesis
and Enoch, are indeed the angels who fell with satan? What if they are
free to take possession (control) of a human bodies - as we have
clearly explained in a document
(7) which shows that
reincarnation appears to
but does not?
If satan, the prince of darkness and
of this world, had control of a large number of humans, would he not
impart tremendous material wisdom to those who worshipped him - thus
helping them establish incredibly advanced and lasting great
civilizations as those which preceded the Egyptians, Mayans, etc.?
Would he not
induce them to develop and practice similar religions (all over the
world and seemingly unconnected) where humans take the place of God and
where rituals call for the offering of human sacrifices to an unseen
"god" (satan himself) and where the snake - the symbol of satan and sin
since the Book of Genesis - takes a leading role?
Let us not forget that the
unparalleled-in-human-history Alexander the Great was born of Olympia
who claimed to have
been impregnated by a snake. Although she was not, the symbolism and
coherence is here too.
After Jesus Christ manifested Himself on Earth ("... Jesus came into Galilee, preaching the
gospel of God, and saying, The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of
God is at hand: repent ye, and believe in the gospel." [Mark 1:14-15]) satan's
hold on the world started to decline. Still, satan's influence,
although declining, was felt over the ensuing twenty centuries, only
to logically flare up, as it has now, at the End of These Times.
Who would induce, for example, Pope Gregory
XIII to offer a solemn Te Deum in St. Peter's Basilica and have a medal
struck reading "Ugonotiorum strages" (the destruction of the Huguenots)
to celebrate the slaughter
in France of over 20,000 Huguenots
(Protestants in France)? The Spirit of God? Of course not!
Who would induce Lenin to unleash upon humanity
the scourge of communism? The Spirit of God? Of
Who would induce Adolph Hitler to plunge the
world in an apocalyptic carnage? The Spirit of God? Of
Who would induce Cardinal Law (8) to single-handedly
promote the destruction of innocent souls entrusted to him and then
induce John Paul II to glorify Law by placing him as
titular head of the most important Basilica dedicated to the Immaculate
One (9)? The
Spirit of God? Of
The only ones who would induce such behavior
would be the (fallen) sons of God alluded to in Genesis (which are the
"Watchers" of the Book of Enoch) acting
through human bodies (7)
and with satan at their head directing the operations.
Would it not then be satan's final coup to make
humanity believe that the sources of those great civilizations and
mythical heroes were Extraterrestials wisely hidden in New Age (10)
teachings? This would then "confirm" to the completely disoriented
humanity that the appearances of Mary, and other supernatural
assistance given by God to His beleaguered children, are not from God
but from some other creatures (11).
What a masterful deception!
matter of record, and just one example of many, miguel de
Portugal has seen [with the confirmation
by a qualified third party who was a practicing Psychologist], in a
approximately fifteen minutes,
ten to fourteen individuals, who looked just "like the guy next door",
simply vanish after entering into a rest room which had no other doors
windows. The circumstances were such that, upon meditating over this
striking event, it was obvious to miguel that they were there on a
"spiritual destruction mission". Obviously having concluded their "job
in the area" they just left in an unobtrusive manner.
How many of those fallen "sons of God" are at
work out there right now under the guise of being regular human beings
or by means of possessing a human victim? Look at the world
today and take a guess!
What can we do then? This and this!
Why now? Because it is that time!
16, 2005 - Feast of Mary's
Purity - European Union
Confirmed on July 15, 2009
True Timeline of Creation link was
added on January 20, 2012.
2005 - 2016 by The M+G+R
Foundation. All rights reserved. However, you may freely reproduce and
distribute this document as long as: (1) Appropriate credit is
to its source; (2) No changes are made in the text without prior
written consent; and (3) No charge is made for it.
About Us and
"the work" of Cardinal Law
The Immaculate One says - Enough!
New Age IS NOT just a Spiritual Past Time
The Fátima Conspiracy
The Function of The M+G+R Foundation
Those who Have Eyes to See and Ears to
Note: If the above dated image
does not appear on this document, it means that you are not viewing the
original document from our servers. Should you have reason to doubt the
authenticity of the document, we recommend that you access our server
again and click on the "Refresh" or "Reload" button of your Browser to
view the original document.
If you wish to
The M+G+R Foundation, please Click
follow the instructions.