The purpose of this document is
to respond to a clear and urgent prompting from Our Lord Jesus
Christ. At this time we have no idea why he moved us to do so.
We are simply obeying His command.
I am a Roman Catholic from the (a major US metropolis) area, who
has seen much evil within the ranks of the clergy, and has suffered
much
by their words and deeds. But I offer my sufferings in reparation for
my
many sins, and for the souls in purgatory.
Thank you for your site. Please pray for me.
C
Response: Your kind
words Glorify God Whom we strive to serve.
Our prayer on someone's behalf,
like the forgiveness from God, should always be considered a completed
act when those who seek it do so with a truly sincere heart, as you
have done.
1. Regarding Bayside and the late
Veronica Leuken. At this time (6-23-1004) we do
not
have any commentary one way or another. This should be understood in
the
light of the fact that, when we do have a commentary in a similar
situation,
we
make it known upon request.
2. Regarding Rev. Malachi Martin's
reference to a "black
mass"
having taken place in the Vatican : Yes, we believe that it did take
place.
The spiritual world is very real and it
has its laws like the physical domain. Such laws apply equally
whether good
or evil.
It was precisely because of the
existence of such laws/requirements
that Our Lord and God had miguel de Portugal travel to The Vatican at
the
end of the year 2000
to
personally deliver a pronouncement upon The Vatican, in His Name,
while
standing on St. Peter's Square and facing The Vatican Complex. A
pronouncement
which, in retrospect,
may have been a response to the
despicable
act reported by Rev. Martin.
Hello, first
off, I love your web site. And I thank you.
I
was wondering where you got the information regarding the "No World War
III"
statement by the Garabandal site. I cannot find it anywhere on
their web site.
Maybe I'm just
missing it. Thank you for your time.
Also,
what are your thoughts on the Bayside Prophecies? Mary talks
about
every subject from MTV to Russia still secretly existing and plotting
behind the scenes. It's seems a bit too much - too many words by
Our
Blessed Mother. It's very tough to keep a
clear mind with the truths, and the intentional falsehoods to distort
and confuse the faithful. I don't know what's right or
wrong anymore
it seems.
Enjoy your night.
G
Response: Your
kind words Glorify God - Thank you!
You must be making reference to a document we
recently
published with
the title About the
Supernatural
Manifestations in Garabandal - A Warning
from
The
M+G+R
Foundation
The footnote no.1 of said document
shows you exactly
where
we obtained
such information.
Regarding Bayside, we have addressed
that issue on our
letter of December 15, 2005 (reproduced above).
In reference to your statement: "It's very
tough to keep a
clear mind with the truths, and the intentional falsehoods to distort
and confuse the faithful." - You are absolutely right and what
we try
to do in this area is to lead the people of God to continual communion
with His Holy Spirit.
When the Holy Spirit of God takes "full time
residence" in our hearts, deception is only possible if God Wills it
and, if God Wills it, so be it! In the meantime we suggest that
you read our documents What
Can We Do ? Part 1
and What
Can We
Do?
-
Part 2
Published
on September 15th, 2009
From
(Ms.) M-AP
@ Canada
I would like to have
your insight about what to believe concerning Bayside
apparitions.
I've read your comments given on December 15, 2005.
I must say I've always felt a bit
awkward when visiting that web site
as opposed to other revelations given by our Lady.
Tonight I'm even more troubled
regarding the position that the church
has taken towards these particular apparitions and the specific
denunciation that Bishop Mugavero has expressly written concerning the
imposture of Pope Paul VI.
How does a good Christian obey to
this? Do we obey the church?
Bless you!
(Ms.)
M-AP
Response:
Regarding
the Bayside apparitions - we have nothing else to add to what we have
already said.
Other key
apparitions approved (1)
and still pending (2) have
more than enough
correct and coherent information, thus we recommend to avoid pursuing
those which "just do not feel right" to the faithful.
Regarding
the letter
allegedly written by Bishop Mugavero (3) - it is a quote by EWTN
from "Cults, Sects, and the New Age," Rev. James J. LeBar (OSV Press).
We cannot consider either source reliable - EWTN from ample personal
experience; and the other one, by default.
Which brings us
to your
central question: How does a
good
Christian obey to this? Do we obey the Church?
As we have done in the past, we go to
the ultimate source - the Holy
Scriptures to back up what we have to say. The answer was already given
by Peter and the other
Apostles when they addressed the high priest, and those that were
with him, the council, and all the ancients of the children of Israel
thus: We ought to obey God,
rather than men. [Acts 5:
17-35]
Regardless of the
preposterous claims
made by the Papacy for centuries,
and without taking away the legitimate position and function of the
Bishop of Rome (4) -
no man takes the place
of God. The teachings of even the highest representative of any
Faith cannot, under any
circumstance, supersede what God has taught
us through the Holy Scriptures.
The
"Church" or any
religious institution representing any faith has only one
function: Facilitate, and help
maintain, a constructive link between an
individual and God. The moment they start trying to supersede
the Word
of God they can be categorized into one of two camps: The camp of
the
Anti Christ forerunners or the camp if the False Christ forerunners.
Blessedly - the fundamental
teachings of God via the Holy Scriptures,
and
specifically of Jesus Christ, are so crystal clear that they do not
need interpretation. The interpretation starts when man wants to adjust
the Word of God to advance his very worldly needs.
What did Jesus tell Peter -
the original one! -
when he was
trying to prevent Jesus from going to Jerusalem?
Get behind me, Satan, thou art a scandal
unto me: because thou savourest not the things that are of God, but the
things that are of men. [Matthew
16:23]
Shortly after receiving your
letter, God "dropped on our lap" a very
current example (5) of
continuing conflicting signals that
come to the faithful from the highest levels of the Vatican. It was as
if He was saying: "In case you need a fresh example, here is one!"
Pierre
Teilhard de Chardin's theology was also viewed with caution
by officials both of
the Jesuit order and in the Vatican. Among other things, officials
worried that his optimistic reading of nature compromised church
teaching on original sin. In 1962 -- seven years after his death -- the
Vatican's doctrinal office issued a warning that his works "abound in
such ambiguities and indeed even serious errors, as to offend Catholic
doctrine."
In
1981, on the 100th anniversary of Teilhard's birth, speculation erupted
about a possible rehabilitation. It was fueled by a letter published in
L'Osservatore Romano, the Vatican newspaper, by the then-Cardinal
Secretary of State Agostino Casaroli, who praised the "astonishing
resonance of his research, as well as the brilliance of his personality
and richness of his thinking." Casaroli asserted that Teilhard had
anticipated John Paul II's call to "be not afraid," embracing "culture,
civilization and progress."
Responding
to ferment created by the
letter, the Vatican issued a statement insisting that its 1962 verdict
on Teilhard still stands -- to date, Rome's last official pronouncement
on Teilhard. (The statement was issued in July 1981, four months before
then-Cardinal Joseph
Ratzinger, the future Pope Benedict XVI, took over
as prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.)
[Pierre
Teilhard de Chardin was
Jesuit
priest, scientist and philosopher .]
fast
forward in time.....
Benedict's brief of July 24
(2009) in reference to Teilhard, praising his vision of the entire
cosmos
as a "living host," can be read on multiple levels -- as part of the
pontiff's rapprochement with the Jesuits, or as a further instance of
finding something positive to say about thinkers whose works have set
off doctrinal alarms, as Benedict previously did with rebel Swiss
theologian and former colleague Hans Küng.
Toward the end of a reflection upon
the Letter to the Romans, in which St. Paul writes that the world
itself will one day become a form of living worship, the pope said,
"It's the great vision that later Teilhard de Chardin also had: At the
end we will have a true cosmic liturgy, where the cosmos becomes a
living host. "Let's pray to the Lord that he
help
us be priests in this sense," the pope said, "to help in the
transformation of the world in adoration of God, beginning with
ourselves."
